We are proud to share that the NLSIU team has won the 25th International Maritime Law Arbitration Moot (IMLAM), hosted by the University of Sydney, Australia from July 6-11, 2025. The team comprised Vedika Warrier (Vth year BA LLB), Vrinda Sinha (IVth year BA LLB) and Advaith Anand (Vth year BA LLB). They competed against National University of Singapore in the finals.
The Problem
This year’s IMLAM problem dealt with shipowners’ indemnities against the charterer for cargo damage claims—under the Inter-Club Agreement, with a particular focus on the precondition of ‘proper settlement’, and under an implied indemnity in a time charter party. The problem can be found here.
Awards
Winners:
Finals: Against the National University of Singapore (NUS)
Semifinals: Against the University of Copenhagen
Quaterfinals: Against the University of Versailles (Paris-Saclay)
Preliminary rounds: Against NLU Jodhpur, Symbiosis Law School Pune, NUS, and the University of Sydney
Best Female Speaker (Final Round): Vrinda Sinha
Best Female Speaker (General Rounds): Vedika Warrier
The Team’s Mooting Experience
Reflecting on the experience, Vrinda Sinha told us:
“I quite enjoyed the issues I worked on, and getting to argue out some subtle points about the common law was, as always, super thrilling, and doubly so when you get questioned by judges who (in the words of one of the organisers) ‘know everything about maritime law.’ Needless to say, the teamwork and collective brainstorming was challenging and taught me a lot. It was quite a hectic preparatory month for us in June, since all of us were interning, too. In hindsight it’s incredible that we managed to get as much practice in as we did—I think the credit for that goes fully to the team being very understanding with each other and proactive about the moot.
My heartfelt thanks to the library staff, who helped us with finding books and resources in this area of the law, and also many seniors who helped us with oral rounds’ preparation, and alumni, particularly Mr. Ashwin Shanker (NLS BA LLB 2000) who coached us, took many rounds for us, and walked us through the fundamentals of maritime law.”
NLS alumna Genesia Rodrigues (NLS MPP 2019), Senior Manager – Public Policy, Kazam, conducted a workshop on ‘Walking Experience of Footpaths’ at NLS between July 28 to 30, 2025. Genesia, who works in the space of urban mobility, had previously conducted a similar workshop on urban infrastructure at NLS. This latest workshop saw the participation of second-year students of the Master’s Programme in Public Policy (MPP), facilitated by Dr. Sony Pellissery, Professor and Co-Director, Centre for the Study of Social Inclusion, NLSIU.
Here’s a short interview with Genesia.
What has been your professional journey since graduating from the MPP Programme at NLS?
I graduated in 2019 and I have been working in the space of urban mobility for the last seven years.
I started my career in urban mobility as a volunteer and I remember finding it very difficult to use buses in Bengaluru. At that time, I used to go to various NGO meetings and found one where they wanted volunteers – the Bangalore Bus Prayaanikara Vedike (BBPV). BBVP works for the mobility rights for government workers, low income groups, domestic workers, sex workers, etc. and questions how we can build inclusive mobility.
I also worked as a consultant to the Government of Karnataka for a time. After that, I was a public policy manager at Namma Yatri, which is a ride hailing application. Currently, I am Senior Manager – Public Policy at an EV tech company, Kazam. Here we are looking at the electrification of mobility and how to make it more accessible for the gig economy, two-wheeler users, delivery fleets and also buses.
Can you tell us more about the workshop?
The workshop focussed on the walking experience of footpaths.
There are certain guidelines for how footpaths should be designed and we looked at whether those guidelines are translating in real life. We also analysed the lived experiences of people.
Footpaths essentially have different uses. Street vendors use them differently. An elderly person, a woman or a child will experience it very differently. So we looked at footpaths from those different lenses. We did a qualitative and a quantitative study, asking:
What’s the width of the footpath?
What’s the height of the footpath?
How much area of the footpath meets policy requirements?
How many number of trees and street lights are present?
I had conducted a similar workshop a couple of years ago at NLS. It was a ward level exercise, where we tried to look at the infrastructure available. (I think Sony Sir still has a chart and creative content from that workshop.) We asked:
Are there schools?
Are there hospitals at a walking distance?
What are the different types of land uses?
How are the lived experiences of a lower income group area versus a higher income group?
What are the different types of infrastructure available for both groups?
How does it feel to come back to your alma mater? What brings you back here?
I think NLS gave me a lot. It gave me a good starting point to kick off my public policy career because I came from an engineering background. The way I looked at policies actually changed in my two years here. It gave me good networks to start with. I have kept in touch with Prof. Babu Mathew(Co-Director, Centre for Labour Studies) and Prof. Sony Pellissery. They both helped me reach out to a lot of NGOs when I was doing my dissertation. I had a very technical dissertation but over the course of time and with their guidance, the ‘people element’ started coming in.
I got a lot from NLS, so I want to give back a little.
Over the course of three weeks in July 2025, the Moot Court Society (MCS) at the National Law School of India University successfully conducted four Open Challenger (OC) rounds to select representative teams for some of the most prestigious international moot court competitions. These include The Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot, The Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, the International Bar Association International Criminal Court Moot, and The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition.
Here are the teams that will represent NLSIU at the following competitions:
The Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition: Anoushka Kothari (BA LLB Vth year), Anshu Varahagiri (BA LLB Vth year), Kartik Kalra (BA LLB Vth year), Rishab Deviah (BA LLB Vth year)
About the Open Challenger
The Open Challenger format for all four competitions, introduced for the first time this year, was conceived as an intensive, simulation-based selection mechanism conducted at the very beginning of the academic year. With two rounds held on campus and two online, the format was tailored to reflect the procedural structure, complexity, and advocacy standards of the actual competitions. Despite tight schedules, the OCs drew participation from over 80 students across batches and were executed with academic rigour and logistical precision.
The orals rounds for the competitions happened on the following days:
Jessup OC: July 13, 2025
Vis (Vienna and Hong Kong) OC: July 19 and 20, 2025
ELSA: July 12 and 13, 2025
IBA ICC: July 5 and 6, 2025
Drafting Problems
Each OC problem was meticulously crafted to align with the subject matter and procedural expectations of the respective moot. The drafting team – Ms. Sanya Kishwar, Ms. Ronjini Ray, Dr. Ajar Rab, and Mr. Arnav Sharma, designed problems that challenged participants to engage with complex issues in international law, commercial arbitration, trade, and criminal procedure. These problems served not only as evaluative tools but as pedagogical exercises, exposing participants to realistic case analysis under pressure.
Adjudication
The rounds were adjudicated by a panel of 16 accomplished legal professionals, many of whom are distinguished alumni of NLSIU and veterans of the international mooting circuit. Their assessments combined doctrinal depth with advocacy expertise, offering participants substantive feedback on argument structure, legal reasoning, and courtroom presentation. All the rounds were marked by high-calibre performances, evidencing participants’ intellectual agility, research clarity, and courtroom composure.
Beyond the competitive dimension, the Open Challengers served as a vital learning platform. For many participants, these rounds constituted their first significant engagement with international-style mooting. The experience enabled students to develop practical advocacy skills, refine their understanding of comparative legal systems, and receive structured guidance from seasoned professionals. Even the teams that may not have won the challengers emerged with a clearer sense of direction, enhanced skillsets, and a deeper appreciation for the demands of global mooting.
The successful execution of the Open Challengers would not have been possible without the exceptional commitment and coordination of the members of the Moot Court Society and the Convenors. Operating under tight timelines and managing multiple complex moots back-to-back, they ensured that every aspect, from problem-setting and judge coordination to logistics and evaluation, was handled with precision and professionalism. Their ability to deliver high-quality rounds within a compressed schedule is a testament to their dedication, efficiency, and deep understanding of the mooting ecosystem at NLSIU.
This initiative reflects the Moot Court Society’s commitment to evolving mooting pedagogy at NLSIU by bridging doctrinal excellence with realistic simulation, and by cultivating not only competitive strength but also intellectual discipline and collaborative learning. As the selected teams now begin their preparations to represent NLSIU at global forums, they carry forward a legacy grounded in academic integrity, procedural excellence, and institutional pride.
The Centre for Labour Studies, and Human Rights Collective at NLSIU, in collaboration with the Domestic Workers Union and Stree Jagruti Samiti, organised a day-long Stakeholder Consultation on Legal Protection for Domestic Workers, in hybrid mode, on August 2, 2025, at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, from 10 am to 5 pm.
This consultation forms part of an ongoing initiative aimed at bringing together diverse perspectives to formulate a legal framework for domestic workers within India.
The impetus for this consultation has been significantly influenced by the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ajay Malik v. State of Uttarakhand [2025 INSC 118]. This judgment mandated the establishment of a national committee to propose legislative measures for domestic workers. Despite this directive, no such committee has yet been constituted.
In response to this, the Human Rights Collective at NLSIU, in partnership with the Centre for Labour Studies, NLSIU, Domestic Workers Union and the Stree Jagruti Samiti, has initiated a series of independent consultations. These consultations are designed to foreground worker experiences and address existing legal gaps. As part of this effort, the team has prepared a position paper critically analysing the current legal landscape and conducted a worker consultation in Bengaluru on July 16, 2025, with a follow-up consultation with union leaders on July 19, 2025.
Notes from the Conference
This consultation was attended by domestic workers’ unions, activists from central trade unions, civil society groups, leading academics, labour lawyers, officials from the state government and law students.
The attendees emphasised on the need for adoption of a separate law for domestic workers and deliberated on the minimum protection that the legislation must guarantee to ensure dignity and rights. They also demanded for immediate compliance with the SC directive in relation to the judgment in Ajay Malik v. State of Uttarakhand.
Dr. G Manjunath, Additional Labour Commissioner, Government of Karnataka said that the Labour Department is working on a Draft Bill on regulating domestic work. The participants welcomed this initiative and called upon the government to release the draft bill for public consultation.
QAMRA also displayed a small part of its collections for attendees to engage with at the NLS Library.
Abstract
The Queer Judgments Project is an initiative that evolved from disparate conversations between the current co-editors about how legal judgments related to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics could have been written in different terms in light of relevant legal frameworks. This project brings together friends, colleagues, scholars, and activists who are interested in improving and challenging the law and its application to make life better for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer and other minoritized people and communities.
This edited collection is the first output of the project and the pages of this book re-imagine, re-write and re-invent judgments, from queer and other complementing perspectives. With an international reach and multi-disciplinary scope, this edited collection invites you to a queer dance through 26 judgments and commentaries.
About QJP
The Queer Judgments Project is an initiative that evolved from disparate conversations between the current co-editors about how legal judgments related to sexual orientation, gender identity and expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) could have been written in more appropriate terms in light of the legal framework at the time. We wanted to cultivate a project that brought together friends, colleagues, and activists who were interested in improving and challenging the law and its application to make life better for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer and other (LGBTIQ+) people and communities.
The main aim of the project is to re-imagine, re-write, re-invent, from queer and other complementing perspectives, judgments that have considered SOGIESC issues.
The project has an international reach and multi-disciplinary scope. Thus, individual contributors are free to choose which judgment they want to focus on, featuring voices from across the globe. Similarly, the audience is to include people outside of academia, marginalised people and young people.
About the Speakers
Vinay Chandran
Vinay Chandran is the Executive Director of Swabhava Trust, a non-governmental organisation in Bengalurur. Established in 1999, Swabhava works on providing access to support services for LGBTQIA+ populations. Swabhava’s programmes include the Sahaya Telephone Helpline (080-22230959), documentation and research, training and workshops, and support spaces for various LGBTQIA+ groups. Vinay is a peer counsellor on the Helpline and set up the projects in Swabhava. His research on healthcare perspectives on SOGI communities has been published (co-edited by Arvind Narrain) in Nothing to Fix: Medicalisation of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SAGE/Yoda Press, 2015). He is currently working on a follow-up book on healthcare discrimination in southern India.
Aishwarya Birla
Aishwarya joined NLSIU in 2022 as an Academic Fellow, and now works as Assistant Professor of Law at NLSIU and Research Associate for the Pluralist Agreement and Constitutional Transformation (PACT) project. Her broad interests include human rights law, anti-discrimination, refugee law, and constitutional law.
Raju Behara
Raju is a non-binary disabled poet and expressive arts practitioner whose work centers queerness, disability, and anti-caste resistance through hybrid forms like blackout and found poetry. Their practice focuses on chronicling and re-imagining erased histories of queer-trans communities via community-led initiatives, including a trans-led expressive arts cohort with the Piravi Art Community. In 2022, they initiated Redefining Queerscapes, a movement using workshops to transform legal texts into protest poetry, archived in the Queer Judgments Project, Reframe Journal and multiple anthologies. Their debut collection, Withering Tempests (2021), explores queer isolation, and their writings on queer-trans journeys in urban spaces in India appears in journals and queer collectives. As an EQUAL fellow and a collaborator with the Asia Pacific Trans Network, Raju documented systemic healthcare barriers faced by trans youth and led Queer & Quarantine, a crisis-intervention initiative, during the pandemic.
Deedee
Deedee is an independent impact consultant supporting Trans- and Women-led organisations across India. Her work is grounded in feminist, anti-caste, and anti-colonial frameworks. She previously served as South Asia Co-Leader at Ashoka Young Changemakers, a Washington D.C.-based organisation known for pioneering the field of social entrepreneurship. An experienced organizer and fundraiser, she has mobilized over $1 million and trained 10,000+ students and educators on the relationship between Empathy and Power in everyday praxis. Deedee holds a Philosophy degree from the University of Delhi, where she also partnered with the Vice Chancellor’s office to advance inclusive student leadership.
Radhika Chitkara
Radhika is an Assistant Professor of Law at NLSIU, Bengaluru, where she is also pursuing her PhD on “Policing Terror: A Legal Cartography of Institutions, Powers and Functions” as Dr. NR Madhav Menon Doctoral Scholar and a grantee of the Law and Social Transformation Grant administered by DAAD-UGC. She is an Editor of the National Law School Journal, and has over twelve years of experience as a human rights scholar and practitioner. Her research interests include policing and civil liberties, gender, and indigenous peoples’ rights.
NLSIU’s UNHCR Chair on Refugee Law organised a talk on ‘Reconsidering Dignity in Theory and Practice’ by Prof. Susan Marks, Professor of International Law, LSE Law School. The talk took place at the Allen & Overy Hall at the Training Centre at the NLS campus on July 28, 2025.
A central concept in constitutional and human rights law, dignity is understood to refer to the inherent worth and value of every human being, and the respect that is due to all of us simply by virtue of our being human. Whereas earlier notions of dignity were tied to status and rank, the modern conception of human dignity is celebrated as egalitarian and universal. But what if human dignity still remains bound up with hierarchy, privilege and rank? This talk will explore that question.
Speaking to us, Prof. Marks said:
“Dignity is a central concept in constitutional law and international law. There’s a huge amount of literature already on dignity, but most of it is extremely abstract, and I was interested in what it would mean to examine dignity as a worldly concept, as a relational concept, as something embodied and experienced.”
It is also the subject of her new book:
“My new book is called Trucanini’s Stare. The title comes from one of the chapters that looks at the situation of a Tasmanian indigenous woman in the 19th century who was photographed many times. She was subjected to a form of anthropometric photography, which is very undignified. But at another level. I found her to possess an incredible dignity in her bearing and that intrigued me and led me to explore her situation further.”
About the Speaker
Susan Marks is Professor of International Law in the School of Law at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She previously taught at the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. Her research seeks to bring insights from critical social theory to the study of international law and human rights. She is the author of The Riddle of All Constitutions, International Human Rights Lexicon (co-written with Andrew Clapham), A False Tree of Liberty and Trucanini’s Stare, and edited a volume entitled International Law on the Left.
NLSIU’s Library Committee organised a poetry reading by Prof. (Dr.) Bishnu N. Mohapatra, Professor of Politics and Director of Moturi Satyanarayana Centre for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, KREA University.
About the event
Poet and political scientist, Prof. Bishnu Mohapatra, brought both his worlds together at NLSIU while discussing his recently published poetry collection ‘Rain Incarnations‘ (Speaking Tiger, 2025). The poetry reading session was organised at the NLS Library Basement on Monday, 4 August 2025, at 4 PM by NLS faculty Dr. Rinku Lamba.
Rain, an enduring figure in poetry across languages, finds fresh expression, in the 35 poems of this volume. NLS faculty Keerthana Venkatesh, opened the session with a welcome note, followed by Ammel Sharon who reflected on the many ways Indian traditions evoke the monsoon across musical forms, classical and folk, through recurring motifs like thunder, frogs, and lovers, each shaped by mood and raga.
Prof. Mohapatra recited the traditions he carries: his mother’s poetry, modern Odia verse, the Ramcharitmanas, and Faiz, alongside selections from his wide ranging collection in Odia and in English. The discussion flowed from the idea of a Puranic “Barshavatar” to questions about the relationship between the poetical and the political. In response, he read his rain poem on Socrates and spoke of his own examination of metaphysical ideas. The evening closed on a note of possibility and, as one student put it, “revolutionary optimism.”
About the poet
Prof. Bishnu Mohapatra is a well-known Indian poet who writes his poetry in Odia. Currently, he is a Professor of Politics and the Director of Moturi Satyanarayana Centre for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences at KREA University, Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, India. He served as the regional anchor of India and South Asia for the World Humanities Report (WHR), published in 2024.
Prof. Mohapatra has authored five volumes of poetry and has translated two volumes of Pablo Neruda’s poetry into Odia. A Fragile World, a book of his poetry in English translation, was published in 2008. He served as the national jury member for the Moortidevi Award of Bharatiya Jnanpith, Delhi, from 2013 to 2015. A volume of his poetry in Hindi translation – Buddha aur Aam – was published by Pralek Prakashan, Mumbai, in 2022. Prof. Mohapatra’s poetry carries not only a theorist’s critical gaze but, more importantly, a seeker’s voice. In terms of great uncertainty and disenchantment, his poetry seeks to re-enchant the world without drowning out contemporary realities.
A volume of his poetry in translation – Rain Incarnations – was published by Speaking Tiger in 2025. He is in the process of completing a volume of Rilke’s poetry in Odia translation.
The Access to Justice in Citizenship Determination Project, NLSIU, and Queen Mary University of London launched a report on the Foreigners Tribunals in Assam titled ‘Unmaking Citizens’ on July 26, 2025. The launch took at Teen Murti Bhavan, Teen Murti Marg, New Delhi.
The report was authored by Mohsin Alam Bhat (Queen Mary University of London), and researchers Arushi Gupta, and Shardul Gopujkar, with the support of researchers and law students from NLSIU.
Hon’ble Mr Justice Madan Lokur (Retired), former Judge, Supreme Court of India
Dr. Usha Ramanathan, Human Rights Activist and Independent Researcher
Mr. HRA Choudhary, Senior Advocate, Gauhati High Court
Dr. Mohsin Alam Bhat, Assistant Professor of Law, Queen Mary University of London
Ms. Darshana Mitra, Assistant Professor of Law and Director-Clinics, NLSIU
About the Report
Based on 1,193 High Court cases, landmark Supreme Court rulings, and in-depth field interviews, the Unmaking Citizens report offers the most comprehensive study yet of Assam’s Foreigners Tribunals. It reveals a legal system in deep crisis: over 165,000 people have already been declared “foreigners,” with 85,000+ cases pending and more than 1 million NRC appeals potentially headed to these opaque tribunals. The report documents widespread arbitrariness in decision-making, including the wholesale rejection of documentary and oral evidence, and the absence of legal norms to protect individuals from wrongful targeting. These are not isolated failures—they reflect an institutionalised machinery of exclusion, with severe regional and national implications.
The National Law School of India University (NLSIU) invites applications for two full-time Research Associate positions to work on the Just Transitions on Indian Streets (JusTIS) project. The position is up to March 2027 and will be based in Bengaluru, with some time spent on fieldwork in Delhi and Kolkata.
The project is the recipient of The British Academy’s Knowledge Frontiers: International Interdisciplinary Research Projects Award for 2025-27 in collaboration with the University of Oxford. Research Associates will report to the project’s co-investigator, Dr. Anwesha Ghosh, who is a faculty member at NLSIU.
About the Project
Just Transitions on Indian Streets (JusTIS) is a collaborative research project that explores how Indian cities can respond to climate change in ways that are fair and inclusive for street-based workers. These workers—such as street vendors, platform workers, and informal transport operators—play a vital role in everyday urban life but are often excluded from decisions that shape the cities they help sustain. As India undertakes major urban and climate transitions, the project seeks to centre the voices, experiences, and knowledge of these workers in planning for more equitable and sustainable urban futures.
The project views the street not just as a space of mobility and commerce but as a key site where climate impacts are directly experienced, where everyday survival strategies are practiced, and where struggles for workers’ rights are played out. JusTIS develops a critical decolonial praxis of dignity and recognition, addressing the systemic invisibility and misrecognition faced by street-based workers in both climate and urban policies. By documenting workers’ knowledge, practices, and histories, the project aims to challenge top-down approaches to climate action and promote more grounded, inclusive alternatives.
With an aim to develop a deeper understanding of how cultures of misrecognition and systemic invisibility affect street-based workers, JusTIS takes a comparative approach to understanding the impacts of climate change on streets in major Indian cities. By examining the experiences of these workers in Bengaluru, Delhi, and Kolkata, the project explores how social injustices and climate vulnerability intersect with each other. The research uses an interdisciplinary methodology, including surveys, oral histories, archival research, and workshops, to capture a comprehensive picture of these issues.
Role Description
The Research Associate will be responsible for:
Working with the research team in conducting surveys and interviews with the project’s various stakeholders.
Assisting in the organisation of participant workshops in research cities.
Helping with archival research in research cities related to the project.
Transcribing data from surveys, interviews, workshops, and other activities.
Undertaking comprehensive literature reviews on relevant topics.
Helping with hosting a 2-day in-person academic workshop at NLSIU.
Attending meetings and reading groups organised by the PI and/or Co-Is.
Maintain monthly progress reports on the activities and budget.
Assist in any other tasks as required.
A. Qualifications
Essential
Master’s degree in social sciences, law, public policy, or allied disciplines
Desirable
Academic background in urban studies, geography, anthropology, mobilities research or cognate fields
Working knowledge of NVivo or an equivalent software package to analyse qualitative data
B. Experience
Essential
2-3 years of research experience post-master’s degree or early career research scholars awaiting PhD defence in issues of livelihood, dignity, and justice.
Proficiency in at least one of the following languages: Bengali, Hindi, Kannada.
Desirable
Familiarity with academic debates on the topics of just transitions, decolonisation, and environmental justice.
Prior experience of conducting fieldwork in research cities and engaging with relevant stakeholders.
Experience of contributing to research publications.
Experience in project coordination roles within a research team.
Flexibility in working from Delhi or/and Kolkata as per project requirements.
C. Skills and Competencies
Excellent communication and writing skills.
Strong execution rigour and operational skills.
Strong presentation and time management skills.
How to apply?
Please use the Google form here, and include the following documents:
An up-to-date CV
A statement of purpose (not more than 500 words)
Contact details and designation of one reference
Compensation
Salary will be commensurate with qualification and experience and will be in the range of Rs. 60,000 – Rs 70,000 per month.
For any queries, please write to .
Deadline
The last date for submission of applications is August 4, 2025 (5 pm IST).
In this week’s faculty seminar, Dr. Sudheesh R C, Assistant Professor, Social Science, presented on ‘Decolonial Dilemmas in Development Cooperation.’ The seminar was held on July 23, 2025, in the Ground Floor Conference Hall at NLSIU’s Training Centre.
Abstract
This article examines Triangular Cooperation, which is garnering popularity in the development sector and is purportedly devoid of the old hierarchies associated with international development. The article locates this emerging mode of cooperation in the context of discussions on decolonisation and turns attention to the need to update the registers used to critique international development. Through an analysis of an array of project documents and a reflexive account of the author’s experiences in the aid sector, it explores the subtle forms of power that play out when “pivotal,” “beneficiary” and “facilitating” partners enter a project. The article argues that such an enquiry helps nuance our examination of coloniality in contemporary times. The article thereby calls for renewed attention to Triangular Cooperation in critical development studies that is currently preoccupied with South-South Cooperation.