The Library Committee is organising a Book Talk on the book ‘Seeking Allah’s Hierarchy: Caste, Labor, and Islam in India,’ authored by Dr. P. C. Saidalavi and published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.
The talk will take place on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, from 5:15 PM at the Conference Hall (Ground Floor), Training Centre, NLSIU and is open to the public subject to prior registration.
Panellists:
Dr. P C Saidalavi, Assistant Professor, Sociology, Shiv Nadar University
Dr. Karthikeyan Damodaran, Assistant Professor, Social Sciences, NLSIU
Dr. Shireen Azam, Postdoctoral Fellow, NLSIU (Moderator)
About the book
In Seeking Allah’s Hierarchy, P. C. Saidalavi provides an ethnographic study of a Muslim barber community in South India, unraveling how these barbers negotiated concepts of hierarchy through Islamic values of piety, genealogy, morality, and wealth. Through this close-drawn study, Saidalavi argues that Muslim hierarchy exists and it works on its own terms. It both draws upon Islamic jurisprudential and moral discourses and is shaped by the larger economic, cultural, and political environment, including that of Hinduism. Yet ultimately, Muslim hierarchy is neither a replica nor a watered-down version of caste in Hinduism.
Seeking Allah’s Hierarchy contends that the Islamization process in South Asia cannot be reduced to conceptual schemas or patterns dictating religious practice. Instead, this process works within a “lived tradition,” in which Muslims attempt to infuse and rationalize their practices using their interpretations of Islamic values, meanings, and purpose. In this case, barbers challenged other Muslims’ perception of them as hierarchically inferior by emphasizing their religious piety. Yet those same Muslims also drew on Islam to provide a rationale for categorizing barbers’ work as morally obligatory but undignified, thus rendering the barbers “lower.”
The barbers’ challenge to this perceptual hierarchical order was inspired by communist political activities in Kerala and commenced when they started unionizing in the 1970s. By establishing shops, instituting uniform pricing, and standardizing working hours, barbers successfully transformed their work relations into labor within the strictures of capitalist market relations. Recounting their story here, Saidalavi complicates the question of “caste” found in the Indian subcontinent by showcasing the specificity of hierarchical practices among Muslims, despite the egalitarianism of their religion.
About the Panellists
Dr. P C Saidalavi is a cultural anthropologist with a background in sociology, literary and cultural studies. He works as an assistant professor at the department of Sociology in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shiv Nadar University, Delhi-NCR. His PhD thesis in Anthropology, which looked at the social hierarchy among Muslims in Malabar, South India, was awarded the Raymond Firth Thesis Prize in Anthropology from the Australian National University in 2022 His broad research interests lie in anthropology of religion, climate change, youth cultures and South Asia (India and Sri Lanka).
Dr. Karthikeyan Damodaran is an Assistant Professor, Social Science at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. He was previously a Research Fellow, affiliated to the Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Germany. He has also worked as Assistant Professor at the Department of Asian Studies, School of Creative Liberal Education, Jain (Deemed to be) University. He was a recipient of Principal’s Scholarship for his PhD at the University of Edinburgh. His previous research focused on caste processions and commemorations in Tamil Nadu, and his current research looks at performances of traditional masculinity in contemporary times.
About the moderator:
Dr. Shireen Azam is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. She is a political theorist working at the intersection of caste, religion, and labour. At NLSIU, Shireen will work on her first monograph, tentatively titled ‘Reclaiming Caste: A New History of the Muslim in Modern India.’ Her recently concluded DPhil at the University of Oxford centres around lower-caste Muslims in the political and constitutional history of India from late 19th-21st century. While housed at the Faculty of Theology and Religion, she taught undergraduate courses in History, Anthropology, and Politics at Oxford.
This week’s faculty seminar features presentation by Ana Enriquez, Head of the Office of Scholarly Communications and Copyright, Penn State University Libraries, and Fulbright-Nehru Scholar, NLSIU, on ‘Conflating Copyright and Ethics.’
Abstract
In resources about copyright law for lay audiences, it is common to conflate acting ethically with following copyright law. Rather than encouraging ethical behavior, this trope shuts down the audience’s ethical reasoning. Nor does this trope encourage learning about copyright law. Instead, it leads to several misunderstandings: it encourages people to think that all copyright wrongs are equivalent; it ignores the variety of approaches to copyright, such as those of other countries or times; and it hides copyright law’s flaws. The solution is not to excise ethical reasoning from discussions of copyright law. The solution is to disentangle the two topics and pay adequate attention to both.
This paper first demonstrates the trope, presenting four examples. Second, it explores the costs of this trope in terms of our understanding of the law. Third, it considers the consequences of overcorrecting in response to this trope, using as an example a U.S. case involving the enforcement of a French copyright judgment. Finally, it offers an antidote to one of the examples from the beginning of the paper, spending time with the ethical questions it raised.
The Centre for the Study of Social Inclusion (CSSI) at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bengaluru invites you to a public seminar on the topic, ‘From Classrooms to Careers: Understanding the School to Work Transition – State of Working India Report 2026,’ with labour economist Dr. Rosa Abraham. The session will be moderated by Dr. Shiuli Vanaja, Assistant Professor, Social Science, NLSIU.
India is nearing the peak of its demographic dividend, with the share of the working-age population expected to begin declining after 2030. On the one hand, higher education in the country has become increasingly democratised with a rapid increase in the number of institutions. Graduate salaried earnings exceed non-graduates both at the time of entry into employment and over their lifetime. On the other hand, financial barriers continue to restrict access, particularly in professional fields such as engineering and medicine. The transition from education to employment remains a major challenge. The rise in the number of graduates has not been matched by commensurate growth in graduate employment. This year’s State of Working India report traces the arc of a young worker’s transition from school or college into employment, and how this has changed in the last forty years. Click here for the SWI 2026 report.
About the Speaker
Dr. Rosa Abraham is an economist whose work focusses on India’s labour market, particularly informal work and women’s employment. She works at the Centre for the Study of Indian Economy (CSIE) at the Azim Premji University (APU) and is the lead author of the State of Working India 2026. Her research engages closely with labour statistics and the dynamics of women’s work, including the impact of major life events such as marriage and childbirth on employment trajectories. At the Centre, she has contributed to large-scale surveys such as the India Working Survey and the COVID-19 Livelihoods Survey. Prior to joining the APU, she worked at the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE) and earlier as a Lecturer at the Madras School of Economics.
The Moot Court Society, a student run society at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bengaluru, in association with Trilegal, is proud to announce the XIX Edition of the NLS-Trilegal International Arbitration Moot (NLSTIAM), supported by SIAC. The competition will be held from May 1-3, 2026.
About NLSTIAM
Since its inception, NLSTIAM has stood as one of India’s most prestigious international arbitration moot court competitions. Now entering its nineteenth year, it has upheld the vision of elevating the standard of arbitration advocacy among law students across India and abroad. Over the years, NLSTIAM has had the privilege of hosting distinguished practitioners and arbitrators including Prof. Martin Hunter, Dr. Gary Bell, Mr. Steven Finizio, Mr. Jonathan Lim of WilmerHale, Mr. Nish Shetty of Clifford Chance, Mr. Leng Sun Chan of Baker McKenzie, and Justice B.N. Srikrishna, among many others.
The XIX Edition is honoured to feature a judging panel of exceptional distinction. Presiding over the Grand Finals include Hon. Mr. Justice Vibhu Bhakru (The Chief Justice, High Court of Karnataka), Prof. Jeffrey Waincymer (Adjunct Professor, National University of Singapore) and Mr. Gourab Banerji (Senior Advocate), luminaries whose experience in international arbitration spans the highest echelons of practice. The semi-finals will be adjudicated by Mr. Srinath Sridevan (Senior Advocate), C.K. Nandakumar (Senior Advocate), Advocate Harishankar Krishnaswami, and Prof. Dr. Ajar Rab among others; practitioners of remarkable standing whose incisive engagement with participants has long been a hallmark of the NLSTIAM experience.
Problem Statement for XIX Edition
The problem for this edition, drafted under the leadership of Mr. Jeffrey Waincymer, is a finely layered commercial arbitration dispute involving cross-border misrepresentation, questions of evidentiary procedure and the role of intermediaries in government-linked transactions. Participants are expected to engage with some of the most contested and evolving issues in contemporary international arbitration, focusing on the SIAC Arbitration Rules.
NLSTIAM continues to attract a highly competitive and diverse pool of participants. In recognition of outstanding performance, the Winners and the Best Speaker at NLSTIAM are awarded coveted internship opportunities at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), in addition to cash prizes.
The XIX Edition reaffirms NLSTIAM’s commitment to raising advocacy standards and we look forward to welcoming participants and adjudicators to Bengaluru for what promises to be an exceptional edition of the competition.
All updates will be posted on Instagram. For the latest updates, follow us on Instagram and LinkedIn.
Click on the link to access the following resources:
The National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bengaluru in collaboration with the University of California College of Law, San Francisco (UC Law SF) and CAMP Mediation, Bengaluru, invites applications for a Faculty Development Workshop on ‘Teaching Negotiation and Mediation.’ The two-day workshop will be held on July 11 & 12, 2026.
This invitation-only cohort workshop is designed for law teachers interested in shaping the future of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), mediation, and negotiation education in India.
Why this workshop?
India stands at an inflection point in dispute resolution. With increasing court backlogs and dissatisfaction with arbitration, mediation is emerging as a central pillar of civil justice reform. The demand for lawyers trained in effective mediation advocacy and counseling skills has become more important than ever. Yet across most law schools in India, training in these subjects remains theoretical, lecture-based, and disconnected from practice.
By contrast, leading law schools in the United States and elsewhere have for decades delivered ADR and negotiation courses in an “experiential” format using role-play simulations adapted from actual practice. These courses are popular with students and are widely regarded as the gold standard in skills-based legal education. The American Bar Association now requires all law students to complete at substantial number of experiential courses prior to graduation.
Over the past two years, faculty from UC Law SF, working closely with CAMP and NLSIU, have piloted and refined a model for bringing this pedagogy into Indian classrooms. They have developed teaching materials, including syllabi, role-plays adapted to the Indian context, and a video of a mediation conducted by Senior Advocate Sriram Panchu – all designed to introduce skills-based learning in lecture classes of 60 or more students. These efforts have received positive feedback from both students and faculty.
About the Workshop
This is not a conventional academic programme. It is a hands-on, immersive training experience designed to help faculty integrate experiential learning methods into the way they teach ADR courses. Participants will:
Experience role plays as a student
Receive coaching in how to structure, facilitate, and debrief role plays as a teacher
Learn how to design, facilitate, and debrief simulations
Learn how to adapt U.S. style experiential teaching methods to the Indian context
Receive access to curated teaching materials and other resources developed by UC Law SF and CAMP Mediation
Work directly with leading educators and practitioners from the U.S. and India
The workshop will combine expert-led sessions on negotiation and mediation theory, simulations, collaborative exercises, and reflective discussions. The two-day in-person workshop will be preceded by 2–3 shorter, virtual sessions.
Participants who successfully complete the programme will receive a Certificate of Completion from NLSIU.
Who should Apply?
We seek a small, carefully selected cohort of participants currently teaching (or interested in teaching) ADR, mediation, or negotiation, including:
Law, Business, or other faculty
Administrators, Deans, or other faculty in leadership positions or responsible for curriculum design at their home institutions
Early-career academics with strong potential
Practitioners engaged in legal education
Resource Persons
Tara Olapally, International Lawyer and Mediator, CAMP Mediation
Tara Ollapally is an international lawyer and mediator with over 25 years of experience across the United States and India. She is the co-founder of CAMP Arbitration and Mediation Practice Pvt. Ltd., one of India’s pioneering private mediation institutions, and has been actively involved in advancing the mediation movement in India since 2015.
Tara regularly trains lawyers, mediators, and professionals in negotiation and mediation. She is part of the CAMP–Edwards Mediation Academy faculty, has taught at multiple law schools in India, and has served as Coordinator for the Mediating Disputes course at Harvard University.
Her mediation practice spans family, inheritance, commercial, construction, real estate, education, and consumer disputes. Her facilitative approach supports parties in reaching informed, collaborative outcomes grounded in mutual understanding.
Tara is licensed to practice law in New York and Bangalore, India, and holds an LL.M. from Columbia Law School.
You can learn more about Tara at www.taraollapally.com
Corey Linehan | Associate Director, Center for Negotiation and Dispute Resolution, UC Law SF
Corey Linehan is Associate Director of the Center for Negotiation & Dispute Resolution at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco. He holds faculty appointments at Bay Path University and Georgetown University Law Center, where his teaching focuses on negotiation, communication, and legal practice. As a consultant with Triad Consulting, he works with organizations and leaders to more effectively address conflict.
Outside his teaching and training, Corey’s career has focused on negotiating complex public policy and government matters. He previously served in roles at the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Senate navigating interbranch conflicts and advancing legislation from drafting through enactment.
Corey holds a JD from Harvard Law School, MEd from the University of Missouri—St. Louis, and BSFS from Georgetown University. He is barred in California.
Dwight Golann | Research Professor at Suffolk University and UC Law SF
Dwight Golann has been a mediator and teacher of dispute resolution for more than thirty years. A Research Professor of Law at the University of California Law—San Francisco and Suffolk University—Boston and, he has led trainings for U.S. government agencies, the European Union, and ADR organizations on five continents.
Professor Golann has resolved hundreds of legal disputes and is the author of the American Bar Association’s leading books on mediation, Mediating Legal Disputes and Sharing a Mediator’s Powers. He formerly served as Chief of the Trial Division for the Massachusetts Attorney General, litigating cases at every level of the American court system.
He is the only person to have received the Lifetime Achievement Award of the American College of Civil Mediators and the ABA Award for Outstanding Scholarship in Dispute Resolution.
Read more at: https://www.suffolk.edu/academics/faculty/d/g/dgolann
Hiro N. Aragaki | Professor of Law and Faculty Director - Center for Negotiation and Dispute Resolution, UC Law SF
Hiro N. Aragaki is a tenured professor of law at University of California College of Law, San Francisco and the Faculty Director of its Center for Negotiation and Dispute Resolution. He is also a Professorial Research Associate at SOAS College of Law in London. His scholarship in ADR has won prestigious accolades and been published in top U.S. law journals, including flagship law reviews at NYU, the University of Pennsylvania, and UCLA. He has consulted on ADR reform projects around the world, including as an Advisor to the Supreme Court of India’s Expert Committee on Mediation (tasked with drafting the bill that would become the Mediation Act, 2023) and as a mediation expert for the World Bank’s Business Ready Project.
He has served as a mediator and arbitrator for over twenty years, most recently with JAMS, is a Chartered Arbitrator and Fellow of the Chartered Institute (U.K.), and a Fellow of the College of Commercial Arbitrators (U.S.).
Read more at: https://www.uclawsf.edu/people/hiro-aragaki
Selection Process
Participation is competitive and by application only. Interested candidates may apply through the form Teaching Negotiation and Mediation. Applicants will be selected based on academic and professional background and demonstrated interest in ADR, including mediation.
Required Documents:
Curriculum Vitae
Statement of Purpose outlining motivation and expected outcomes from the workshop (in not more than 500 words)
Application Deadline
Send in your applications by: May 20, 2026. Decisions will be made on a rolling basis until all seats are filled.
Participants are responsible for travel and accommodation, the details of which will be shared with shortlisted participants
Session Agenda
Teaching ADR with experiential pedagogies
This two-day faculty development workshop will focus on the experiential pedagogies most suited to courses in alternative dispute resolution, especially those focused on negotiation and/or mediation. The two-day in-person workshop will be preceded by two virtual sessions, both up to two hours in length, that will ensure all participants arrive for the workshop with a rich understanding of the dispute resolution theory to which the pedagogies explored at the workshop are aligned. The in-person sessions will provide participants an opportunity not just to study new teaching tools but to practice implementing them in an interactive, experiential context.
Day 1 | July 11, 2026
Day 1: Morning Sessions
The workshop will open with an exploration of the purposes of experiential education and how the pedagogies to be explored over the weekend relate to a model ADR curriculum to which participants will have access. Participants will study and practice active listening frameworks that strong negotiators, mediators, and advocates in ADR processes use. The session will then also teach tools for providing students feedback in an experiential context, including distinctions between coaching and evaluative assessment.
Day 1: Afternoon Sessions
The afternoon sessions will focus on best practices for using roleplays to teach negotiation—including their purposes, how to set them up, and how to debrief them so that students’ experiences are translated into robust theoretical and practical takeaways. Participants will have the opportunity to practice debriefing a negotiation roleplay and use the listening and feedback frameworks presented in the morning session.
Day 2 | July 12, 2026
Day 2: Morning Sessions
The second day will open with an opportunity to recap and interrogate anew key themes from the first day’s sessions. The focus will then shift to deploying experiential techniques to teach mediation. Participants will lean and practice an exercise to help students distinguish mediation from arbitration as common alternative resolution pathways. They will then also have an opportunity to practice using demonstration videos to tech key structural elements of the mediation process.
Day 2: Afternoon Sessions
The final afternoon will begin with an opportunity for participants to learn and practice several exercises from a model ADR curriculum, including exercises on active listening and mediator selection. There will then be an opportunity to explore roleplay and debrief differences for mediation cases. The day will conclude with an opportunity to identify and articulate key takeaways from the weekend.
Anahita Surya, Visiting Faculty at the National Law School of India University is bringing together Nikhil Dey, Rakshita Swamy, and Inayath Ali for a lecture on, “Legislating, Protecting, and Institutionalising People’s Law,” as per the details below:
Day & date: Thursday, April 23, 2026 Time: 2 – 4 PM Venue: NAB-102, NLSIU
The speakers will speak about their experiences of building and sustaining people’s movements to legislate and subsequently protect people-centric laws such as MGNREGA, RTI and, more recently, laws related to gig workers. Drawing on grassroots social accountability movements, they will also discuss people-driven mechanisms for accountability and democratic engagement.
About the Speakers
Nikhil Dey is an Indian social activist and a Founding Member of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS). He has been at the forefront of several landmark campaigns, including the movements for the Right to Information (RTI) and the Right to Work (MGNREGA). Committed to transparency, accountability, and grassroots democracy, he continues to strengthen people’s participation in governance. In 2023, the U.S. State Department recognised him as an International Anti-Corruption Champion.
Rakshita Swamy is the Founder and Director of SAFAR. She, along with her colleagues and campaigns, works with Governments and Civil Society Organisations towards creating and institutionalising social accountability mechanisms. Her work is at the intersection of law, advocacy and research to help people claim their rights, improve the functioning of public institutions, and strengthen norms of democratic participatory governance. She also regularly teaches as a visiting faculty at NLSIU. She is associated with the Right to Information and Right to Work Campaigns.
Inayath Ali is the President of the Karnataka App-based Drivers Union and the Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers. He is a prominent voice for gig workers’ rights and has founded one of the earliest unions of platform-based gig workers in the State. He is also a member of the First Gig Workers Welfare Board of the country, set up under the Karnataka Gig Workers Act.
This week’s faculty seminar featured presentation by Jai Chander Brunner, Assistant Professor of Law, NLSIU on ‘Confused Constitutional Morality: Evaluating the Supreme Court’s Equality Doctrine in a post-Anuj Garg Era.’
Abstract
During the hearings in the Sabarimala review matter, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta questioned how Navtej Johar could have struck down Section 377 IPC on the basis of constitutional morality.
Tushar Mehta reasoned that constitutional morality is not defined by the Constitution, leaving judges with vast discretion to give it any meaning. The concept is vague. Writing in 2023, Aparna Chandra foreshadowed that judicially evolved concepts such as constitutional morality and transformative constitutionalism were underspecified, and formed an unsound basis for the Court’s progressive judgments in cases such as Navtej Johar and Joseph Shine. Chandra cautioned that the Court had neither precisely defined these concepts nor articulated a method for defining these concepts. They are excessively open-textured and can be misused to serve unconstitutional ends. Though it is true that the Court has yet to specify the general boundaries of constitutional morality and transformative constitutionalism in all cases, this paper contends that they have acquired a specific usage in gender and sex equality cases — in particular, in cases where a law disadvantages a woman or a sexual and gender minority (“WSGM”).
Examining judgments that develop Anuj Garg, this paper reveals how the Court has referred to constitutional morality to invoke a higher degree of scrutiny. The Court has established a coherent method for invoking constitutional morality and transformative constitutionalism in a relatively consistent manner in cases where the impugned law disadvantages WSGM claimant groups: if the State justifies an exclusionary statute on the basis of popular morality, then the Court will lower the degree of deference to the State, even as far as reversing the presumption of constitutionality.
The National Law School of India University (NLSIU) in collaboration with Australian Consulate-General in Bengaluru organised a discussion on ‘Why Stories Matter: Law, Poetry and Indigenous Storytelling,’ with Indigenous Australian writers, Ali Cobby Eckermann and Merinda Dutton on Wednesday April 22, 2026 at 5 PM.
This discussion brought together two powerful Indigenous Australian voices, those of Ali Cobby Eckermann and Merinda Dutton, in conversation with Radhika Chitkara, Assistant Professor of Law, NLSIU. Together, the speakers explored the power of storytelling to give voice and a seat at the table to communities who are often marginalised. Ali, an award-winning writer and poet, reflected on how her practice of poetry has shaped her identity, helped her find her voice, and offered her a place at the table. Merinda, an eminent lawyer and an emerging writer, reflected on law as a form of storytelling, and on how legal systems can enable Indigenous peoples to articulate lived experiences, assert their rights, and challenge dominant narratives. Our speakers explored the intersections between law and poetry, structure and creativity. The discussion invited students and scholars to reconsider how justice and voice are made and remade through stories.
About the Speakers
Ali Cobby Eckermann is an award-winning Yankunytjatjara poet. Her first collection little bit long time launched her literary career in 2009. In 2013 she won the Kenneth Slessor Prize and Book Of The Year (NSW) for Ruby Moonlight. In 2014, Ali was the inaugural recipient of the Tungkunungka Pintyanthi Fellowship at Adelaide Writers Week, and the first Aboriginal writer to attend the International Writing Program at University of Iowa. In 2017 she received a Windham Campbell Award for Poetry from Yale University. She was awarded a Literature Fellowship by the Australian Council for the Arts in 2018, and in 2019 was awarded a prestigious Civitella Ranieri Fellowship in Italy. She is the Earth, a verse novel, won the 2024 NSW Premier’s Literary Awards Book of the Year and Indigenous Writers Prize and was shortlisted for the 2024 Prime Minister’s Literary Awards and the Stella Prize.
Merinda Dutton is a Gumbaynggirr and Barkindji woman emerging writer, First Nations critic, and the co-founder of Blackfulla Bookclub, an online community for First Nations stories. In 2019 Dutton was recognised for her legal aid work with Indigenous communities and awarded the National Indigenous Legal Professional of the Year.
Radhika Chitkara is Assistant Professor at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bengaluru. Her work is grounded in long-standing engagements with civil liberties, women’s, and land rights movements in northern and eastern India. As a legal researcher and human rights practitioner, she has undertaken primary and doctrinal research, investigations into rights violations, documentation, advocacy, direct legal representation, and legal literacy initiatives, both independently and in collaboration with civil society collectives and NGOs.
The JSW Centre for the Future of Law at NLSIU is organising a talk and discussion on the topic, “Content Moderation – From Social Media Platforms to AI Chatbots: What is the Legal and Technological Framework?” by Julia Hörnle, Professor of Internet Law at Queen Mary, University of London.
Day & date: Monday, April 27, 2026
Time: 2:00 – 3:00 PM
Venue: Allen and Overy Hall, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Campus
The Talk is open to the public with mandatory registration here.
About the Speaker
Julia Hörnle, is Professor of Internet Law at Queen Mary, University of London. She has held the Chair of Internet Law at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London since 2013.
Her research areas are Cyberspace Law & Digital Rights, Internet Regulation, Jurisdiction of States Online and Online Dispute Resolution. She examines from a critical-analytical perspective the law related to the internet, cloud computing, social media and artificial intelligence. Her recent research focusses on the regulation of social media, the liability of intermediaries for user-generated content, and the use of artificial intelligence for content moderation online.
She has held visiting research and teaching positions at the at the Max Planck Institute for International and Comparative Criminal Law, at the Institute for Telecommunications and Media Law, University of Münster, at the European University Institute, Singapore Management University, the National University of Singapore and Georgetown University Washington DC.
She was educated at the University of Göttingen, the University of Leeds (1995) and the University of Hamburg, Germany (1996). She trained with the law firm of Eversheds in London and Brussels and qualified as a solicitor in 1999. She gained a University of London PhD in 2008. Read more.
The National Law School of India University (NLSIU)< Bengaluru hosted a campus reunion for the BA LL.B. (Hons.) Batch of 2015 on Saturday, April 25, 2026, as the cohort marked ten years since graduating from the University. The reunion brought alumni back to campus for a special occasion of reflection, reconnection, and celebration, offering an opportunity to revisit the spaces, memories, and friendships that shaped their time at NLSIU.
Prof. (Dr.) Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Vice-Chancellor, NLSIU addressed the gathering virtually while the introductory remarks were delivered by Dr. Saurabh Bhattacharjee, Registrar, NLSIU. Earlier, the alumni were welcomed by Deepti Soni, Director, Communications and External Relations, NLSIU. Their remarks acknowledged the achievements of the batch and the continuing role of alumni in strengthening the NLSIU community.
Over the course of the day, alumni reconnected with batchmates, faculty members, and other members of the NLS community, renewing friendships and celebrating the enduring bonds formed during their years at the University. Filled with conversations, shared memories, and nostalgia, the gathering was a reminder of the strong sense of community that continues to define the NLSIU alumni network long after graduation.