The NLS Public Lecture Series | ‘The Art and Litigious Life of K. Venkatappa’ | By Pushpamala N and Deeptha Achar

The National Law School of India University (NLSIU) was delighted to host artist Pushpamala N and scholar Deeptha Achar on January 7, 2026 as part of our Public Lectures series.

About the Lecture

‘Looking at Karnataka’s First Modern Artist K. Venkatappa’ by Pushpamala N

In her illustrated discussion of K. Venkatappa (after whom the Venkatappa Art Gallery in Bengaluru is named), artist Pushpamala N framed him as a crucial regional modernist shaped by Mysore court patronage who deviated from the colonial aesthetic of oil painting and the Bengal School’s spiritualised art. Patronised by Krishnaraja Wodeyar IV in Mysore and trained at the Madras School of Art and Crafts, Venkatappa absorbed Western academic techniques and familiar with anti-materialist, pan-Asian aesthetic debates associated with a figure like Abanindranath Tagore under whom he studied. Pushpamala highlighted how his practice, seen in series such as the Ramayana illustrations, Mad after Veena, charcoal drawings, bas-reliefs, and later landscapes, privileged colour, wash, or sculptural solidity over the Bengal School’s ethereal line. His muscular, grounded bodies, use of industrial materials like plaster, and mythic-classical themes reflected both a working-class sensibility and Mysore’s distinctive modernity. Overall, Venkatappa emerges as a “lost ancestor” in Karnataka, an artist who forged a regional aesthetic modernism that negotiated courtly patronage, nationalism, and experimentation without replicating Calcutta’s cultural hierarchy.

‘National Art, Regional Modernity, and the Litigious Life of K. Venkatappa’ by Deeptha Achar

Deeptha Achar read K. Venkatappa’s litigious life as central to understanding both his contradictory personality and the nexus between law, art, and Indian modernity. Moving between Mysore, Calcutta, and Bangalore, Venkatappa repeatedly turned to law as a mode of self-fashioning and public engagement, even as he cultivated the persona of an unworldly, inward-looking artist. Achar argues that his court cases—including disputes with institutions like the Indian Oriental Society and the dramatic but ultimately unsuccessful suit against the Mysore king—were not merely personal grievances but assertions of artistic worth, property, and dignity by someone marked by artisanal caste origins within a hierarchical courtly order. His insistence on litigation, even when compromise was offered, dramatised the radical promise of legal equality under modern law, while also revealing its social and material costs. Through his diaries written in English over many decades, law appears as a lived social space in which Venkatappa negotiated being “an artist rather than an artisan,” exposing the tensions between caste, profession, nationalism, and the fragile democratisation promised by modern legal institutions.

About the Speakers

Pushpamala N

Pushpamala N has been called “the most entertaining artist-iconoclast of contemporary Indian art”. In her sharp and witty work as a photo- and video-performance artist, sculptor, writer, and curator, and in her collaborations with writers, theatre directors and filmmakers, she seeks to subvert the dominant discourse. She is known for her strong feminist work, informed by cultural theory, feminist studies and social science. Her work is shown worldwide and is in the collections of major museums like the Museum of Modern Art New York, Tate Modern London, Centre Charles Pompidou Paris, Art Gallery of New South Wales Sydney, NGMA and KNMA Delhi and MAP Bangalore. She created a fictional platform for discourse, ‘Somberikatte’ (Idler’s Platform) in 1996 through which she organises talks and conferences. To celebrate 20 years of Somberikatte, she organised an international conference of the early modern artist K Venkatappa in Bangalore in 2016. Based on the papers presented at this conference, her co-edited volume: Nation, Region, Modernity: The Art of K. Venkatappa has been published by Routledge ( 2025). She was the Artistic Director of the Chennai Photo Biennale , ‘Fauna Of Mirrors’ , for which she also organised an international conference on photography, Light Writing (2019). Recently she curated the print retrospective exhibition of Gulammohammed Sheikh: ‘Hand Prints/ Mind Prints’ and is now working on the book. She lives and works in Bangalore.

Deeptha Achar

Deeptha Achar has just retired as Professor, Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Gujarat. Among the books she has co-edited are Towards New Art History: Studies in Indian Art (2003), and Articulating Resistance: Art and Activism (2012) apart from catalogue essays. Her most recent co-edited volume is Nation, Region, Modernity: The Art of K. Venkatappa (2025). She is the series editor of the Different Tales, a multilanguage series of illustrated children’s books that thematise marginalised childhoods. She has co-curated an archival show entitled Enlightenment from an Unlikely Envelope: Archives of Adil Jussawalla currently running at the Kerala Museum, Kochi. Her research interests include visual culture studies and childhood studies.

MEA Distinguished Lecture Series | Evolution and the Future of the Indo–US Strategic Partnership | By Ambassador Ashok Sajjanhar

We were delighted to host Ambassador Ashok Sajjanhar, IFS (Retd), Former Ambassador of India to Kazakhstan, Sweden, and Latvia, at the NLS campus on January 6, 2026. Ambassador Sajjanhar delivered a talk as part of the ‘MEA Distinguished Lecture Series’ by the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.

His talk, titled ‘Evolution and the Future of the Indo–US Strategic Partnership: With Emphasis on Trade Policy and Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific Region,’ was held at the NLSIU Conference Hall, Training Centre.

Ahead of the talk Ambassador Sajjanhar met with NLSIU Vice-Chancellor Prof. (Dr.) Sudhir Krishnaswamy; Registrar In-Charge Dr. Nigam Nuggehalli; Dean-Academics & Associate Professor of Law Dr. Saurabh Bhattacharjee; Assistant Professor of Social Science Dr. Debangana Chatterjee; Associate Professor of Law Dr. Harisankar K Sathyapalan; and Ms. Deepti Soni, Director, Communications and External Relations.

The programme commenced with inaugural remarks by Ms. Deepti Soni, introducing the speaker and the talk. Dr. Harisankar K Sathyapalan moderated the ensuing Q&A session, and Dr. Debangana Chatterjee concluded the event with the Vote of Thanks.

Abstract

Relations between India and USA have experienced many ups and downs since India’s independence 78 years ago. Relations sank to their nadir in 1971 and 1998. However, ties between the two countries witnessed a steady upward trend since 2000. Addressing the Joint Session of the US Congress in 2016, PM Narendra Modi declared that India ‘’has overcome the hesitations of history.’’ In 2022, speaking with the then US President Joe Biden, PM Modi stated that India-US partnership is based on ‘’trust.’’ This trust received a huge jolt in 2025 with the assumption of power by Donald Trump as the President of USA. This is evident not only in the area of trade in which US actions are totally violative of International Trade Rules as enshrined in the WTO but also in areas of political, security and strategic affairs. What is likely to be the future state of India-US relations? Can the mutual trust be restored or will the relations revert to the period of the Cold War?

About the Speaker

Ambassador Ashok Sajjanhar, IFS (Retd), was Former Ambassador of India to Kazakhstan, Sweden, and Latvia. He has also worked in senior diplomatic positions in Indian Embassies/Missions in Washington DC, Brussels, Moscow, Geneva, Tehran, Dhaka and Bangkok, and at Headquarters in India.

He negotiated for India in the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations and in India-EU, India-ASEAN and India-Thailand Free Trade Agreements. He contributed significantly to strengthening strategic and economic ties and promoting cultural cooperation between India and USA, EU, Russia and other countries.

Ambassador Sajjanhar worked as Head of the National Foundation for Communal Harmony to promote amity and understanding between different religions, faiths and beliefs. He has been decorated by Governments of Kazakhstan and Latvia with their National Awards and by Universal Peace Federation, New York (a body in special, consultative status with the United Nations) with Title of “Ambassador of Peace.”

Presently he is the Executive Council Member, at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses; President of the Institute of Global Studies; and a Distinguished Fellow at Ananta Aspen Centre.

He writes, travels and speaks extensively on issues relating to international relations, foreign policy and themes of contemporary relevance and significance.

Gallery

The Third SLR Annual Workshop | By Socio-Legal Review (SLR)

The Socio-Legal Review is delighted to announce the Third Annual SLR Workshop. Through this initiative, SLR hopes to further the understanding of its aims and scope, and more broadly the meaning of “socio-legal” scholarship. The workshop will also provide practical and useful guidance on how one may contribute to the SLR Journal or Forum, or socio-legal academic spaces in general.

SLR is a peer-reviewed, bi-annual journal that encourages interdisciplinary research at the intersection of law and social sciences. It is open-access and student-run, published by the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bengaluru.

About the Keynote Speaker

The keynote speaker for the workshop is Dr. Anindita Adhikari, Assistant Professor, Social Sciences at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. Her research interests include social movements, bureaucracies, the politics of welfare provisioning and democratic deepening. She has been associated with the Right to Work, Right to Information, and Right to Food campaigns. She has previously worked with the Government of Bihar and the Ministry of Rural Development on employment, social security, and land issues. She co-founded the  organization ‘Social Accountability Forum for Action and Research’ (SAFAR) in 2022 that works on strengthening transparency and accountability in public service delivery in collaboration with state and national governments and civil society. Her book project ‘from Shikayat to Jawaabdehi’ examines the effects of rights-based welfare expansion and its effects on local governance and civic action through a comparison between two institutionalized accountability systems in Bihar.

About the Workshop

The workshop will begin with a discussion on the scope of socio-legal scholarship generally, its role in the current moment and its place within the larger movement of legal scholarship in India. The keynote speaker will present some of her ongoing research and specifically address the audience on the question of positionality in doing socio-legal research. This will be followed by a discussion on a pre-circulated paper that closely relates to the discipline. Members of the SLR Editorial Board will discuss SLR’s Submission Guidelines and Editorial Policies. The session will be followed by a Q&A round.

The workshop is designed and intended for an audience of students across undergraduate, postgraduate and graduate levels as well as early career academics.

The Workshop is open-to-all, and will be taking place online on Microsoft Teams, from 11 AM – 12: 30 PM on Saturday, 10th January 2026. Please note that registration is mandatory, in order to attend. Please fill the form here to register.

For any queries, please reach out to .

Book Talks@NLS Library | ‘Copyright as Personal Property’

NLSIU’s Library Committee organised a Book Talk on ‘Copyright as Personal Property,’ authored by Dr. Poorna Mysoor and published by the Oxford University Press. The talk, held on January 9, 2026, saw Dr. Poorna Mysoor in conversation with NLSIU’s Prof. (Dr.) Arul George Scaria.

About the Book

Copyright statutes in many jurisdictions clearly state that copyright is a property right. However, it is not always clear exactly how. Some see it as no more than a statutory right, while others think of it as a chose in action (French for “thing in action”), like debts or shares. Copyright as Personal Property demonstrates why it is incorrect to conceptualise copyright as a chose in action and argues that, despite being an intangible asset, copyright is more analogous to land and chattels.

The book aims to achieve two main objectives. The first is to demonstrate much against popular belief that the analogies with land and chattels help contain the scope of copyright within normatively justifiable limits. Starting with the “thing relatedness” of copyright, the monograph draws parallels with the acquisition of copyright, the nature of exclusionary rights, exclusive powers and privileges, their enforcement, and derivative interests. It employs concepts of property theory, such as numerus clausus, to provide the necessary benchmark to guide the boundaries of copyright. The second objective is to challenge the rigid and binary classification of property rights into choses in possession and choses in action. By addressing an important evolutionary gap in the conceptualization of property rights, this work lays the groundwork for a more sophisticated taxonomy, viewing property rights as existing on a spectrum. It goes on to provide the metrics to calibrate this spectrum, ensuring the incremental and orderly development of property rights.

Original and thought-provoking, the analogy this book develops with land and chattels shows how the unjustifiable expansion of copyright can be curbed and offers a more sophisticated classification of property rights than that based simply on tangibility.

About the Panellists

Dr. Poorna Mysoor is a Fellow in Law at Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge. She is also a member of Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge. She was a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, a Junior Research Fellow at the Queen’s College, Oxford, and an academic member at the Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre. She is the author of two books, Copyright as Personal Property (2025) and Implied Licences in Copyright Law (2021), both published with Oxford University Press, and has published her work widely in reputed journals and edited collections. Poorna obtained her undergraduate law degree at NLSIU, Bangalore, and an LLM from SOAS, University of London for which she was awarded the Felix Scholarship. Before embarking on her doctorate, Poorna practised intellectual property law for several years in Hong Kong and was a litigator in India.

Prof. (Dr.) Arul George Scaria is a Professor of Law and Co-Director, Centre for IP Research and Advocacy (CIPRA) at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. His expertise lies in intellectual property and competition law. He teaches, researches, and writes on issues at the intersection of law, science, and technology. Prof. Arul has been a lead researcher in different research projects, including an UNESCO funded project on challenges and opportunities for open science in four South Asian countries. He has two single authored books to his credit – Piracy in the Indian Film Industry: Copyright and Cultural Consonance (Cambridge University Press, 2014) and Ambush Marketing: Game within a Game (Oxford University Press, 2008).

Gallery

Muse@NLS Library | ‘So That You Know’ | Poetry Reading With Dr. Mani Rao

NLSIU’s Library Committee organised a poetry reading with Dr. Mani Rao, author of the anthology So That You Know (Harper Collins 2025). The reading took place at the NLS Library Basement on Monday, January 5, 2026, at 4 PM.

About the Poet

Dr. Mani Rao is the author of thirteen poetry books including So That You Know (Harper Collins 2025), and four books in translation including Bhagavad Gita and Saundarya Lahari. Researching mantra experience in tantric communities, she discovered continuing revelations and new mantras in circulation on-ground for Living Mantra: Mantra, Deities and Visionary Experience Today.

After studying literature in the early 80’s Madras, she worked as an advertising and television professional for two decades in Mumbai, New Zealand and Hong Kong. A resetting of life-goals led her back to the world of learning – she then did an MFA from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA, and a PhD in Religious Studies from Duke University, USA. Returning to India by 2017, she began to live in Puttaparthi and Bangalore.

Gallery

Roundtable on ‘Two Decades of Product Patents in India’ | By the Centre for Health Law, Policy and Ethics and CIPRA, NLSIU

A roundtable on ‘Two Decades of Product Patents in India’ was organised by the Centre for Health Law, Policy and Ethics and the Centre for Intellectual Property Research and Advocacy (CIPRA), National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. The roundtable was held on January 10, 2026, at the National Law School of India University.

Background

The WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) came into effect on January 1, 1995. As per Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement, patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. Some of the developing countries, including India, were not granting product patents in some areas like pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, at the time of signing of the agreement. In fact, many scholars have pointed out that the specific exclusion of product patents in the area of pharmaceuticals in the Patents Act 1970 has contributed substantially to the blooming of generic pharmaceutical companies in India, and thereby also making India a pharmacy of the world. However, as a signatory to the TRIPS Agreement, India was forced to reintroduce product patents in the area of pharmaceuticals. By virtue of Article 65.4, India got 10 years to comply with the TRIPS requirements in this regard, and the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, India made the necessary changes in this area.

About the Roundtable

The roundtable focussed on the historical dimensions and the key changes that have happened in the area of pharmaceutical patents in India over the last 20 years. The panel included Ms. Jayashree Watal (Former Counsellor, WTO), Ms. Vindhya S. Mani (Partner, Technology Law Division, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys, Bengaluru), Ms. Archana Jatkar (Associate Secretary General, Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance), Mr. K. M. Gopakumar (Senior Researcher and Legal Advisor, Third World Network) and Dr. Zakir Thomas (Founding Project Director, OSDD). The sessions were moderated by Dr. Arul George Scaria, Professor of Law and Co-Director, Centre for IP Research and Advocacy (CIPRA) and Ms. Bhanu Tanwar, Assistant Professor of Law and Co-Director, Centre for Health Law and Ethics (CHLPE).

Ms. Jayashree Watal began her presentation with a discussion on the historical dimensions of the treaty negotiations and the position of India during the negotiations.  She also discussed how before the 1970 Patents Act, India relied heavily on expensive imports that favored foreign manufacturers. To foster self-reliance, the government moved toward a regime that protected process patents only, however this was a strategy used by several developed nations to develop their domestic industries as well, and therefore contrary to popular belief, India’s position was not unusual. She credited the growth of the Indian pharmaceutical generic industry to not just the patent law, but also to other external factors like the 1978 Drug Policy and the Foreign Exchange Regulation law. The discussion highlighted the approaches taken by India at different stages of the TRIPS negotiations, the victory in getting in terms of securing a flexible compulsory licensing provision, and the need for strengthening international negotiations by including the participation of more subject matter experts and consultations in the subject area.

Discussing the approach of the Indian judiciary, Ms. Vindhya S. Mani discussed the balancing role being played by the Indian judiciary to protect patents on one hand and the public interest on the other, particularly in light of Section 3(d). She highlighted how India is characterised as an interim injunction-oriented jurisdiction, where courts often grant early relief in patent cases. She argued that while legal tools like pre-grant oppositions exist to filter frivolous patent filings, they are often under-utilised or misused by third parties.

Ms. Archana Jatkar shared the perspectives of the Indian pharmaceutical industry, particularly with the help of data on the economic and public health contributions of the industry. She highlighted that the Indian pharmaceutical industry has evolved from import dependence to becoming a global export powerhouse, supplying 40% of US generic demand. However, according to her, the industry still faces significant hurdles relating to “evergreening” strategies adopted by big pharmaceutical companies through diverse pathways such as patent thickets and data exclusivity. She highlighted that over the years litigations in the area have moved from ideological battles towards more technical disputes.

Mr. KM Gopakumar shared the civil society perspectives and flagged many concerns.  This included the lack of robust expert consultations and institutional decision-making within India before representing India’s position at international fora. He also highlighted instances wherein the patent office in India granted a high volume of patents relating to existing drugs and argued that the increasing patent grant rate in India might be illustrating the increasingly weak patent examination process. Furthermore, he also argued that the government and judiciary are reluctant to use compulsory licensing due to fears of international political repercussions. According to him, this negatively impacts the right to life guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.

With the help of data from some of the recent reports, Dr. Zakir Thomas discussed how despite claims of global dominance, India’s pharmaceutical sector remains obsessed with volumes, and not the global value in research. He highlighted that most of the Global Capability Centers (GCCs) in India focus on peripheral areas, and not the much-required core area of invention of new molecules. He also pointed out that unlike China’s state-backed innovation agenda, India risks a “middle-income trap” due to a lack of significant R&D investment by the state and the domestic firms. He argued that the government must implement “carrot and stick” policies, such as specific tax breaks, to promote innovations in the sector.

Schedule

I. Introduction by Dr. Arul George Scaria (Professor of Law, NLSIU) | 9.30-9.35 am

II. Session 1 | 9:40-11:00 am
Moderator: Dr. Arul George Scaria
Panellists:
(i) Ms. Jayashree Watal (Former Counsellor, WTO) – Historical Perspectives
(ii) Ms. Vindhya S. Mani (Partner, Technology Law Division, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Attorneys, Bengaluru) – Approach of the Judiciary

III. Tea Break | 11.00-11.30 am

IV. Session 2 | 11:30 am – 13:30 pm
Moderator: Bhanu Tanwar (Assistant Professor of Law and Co-Director, Centre for Health Law and Ethics, NLSIU)
Panellists:
(i) Ms. Archana Jatkar (Associate Secretary General, Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance) – Industry Perspectives
(ii) Mr. K. M. Gopakumar (Senior Researcher and Legal Advisor, Third World Network) – Civil Society Perspectives
(iii)Dr. Zakir Thomas (Founding Project Director, OSDD) – Innovation within the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry

V. Vote of thanks by Bhanu Tanwar

Gallery

The NLS Public Lecture Series | ‘Temporary Lives: Law, Ruination, And The Right To Dwell In Lagos’ | By Daniel E. Agbiboa, Harvard University

The National Law School of India University organised a public lecture on ‘Temporary Lives: Law, Ruination, And The Right To Dwell In Lagos’ by Daniel E. Agbiboa, John & Ruth Hazel Associate Professor of the Social Sciences at Harvard University on January 12, 2026.

Temporary Lives: Law, Ruination, And The Right To Dwell In Lagos

Across the Global South, urban eviction is increasingly justified in the language of climate adaptation, risk management, and development. Drawing on Agbiboa’s book-in-progress, ‘Dredged Lives: Futures and Foreclosures in an African City,’ this talk examines how such rationales operate in Lagos, Nigeria, where waterfront communities are routinely demolished in the name of  environmental safety, urban renewal, or megacity ambition. Agbiboa argues that these clearances are not failures of governance but deliberate techniques of rule. They take the form of self devouring growth and bureaucratic violence that convert land into speculative value by  rendering certain lives temporary.

Focussing on precarious waterfront communities, Agbiboa traces how law functions less as protection and more as performance. Court orders are ignored, notices are withheld, and legality is retroactively rewritten. In this context, eviction is not an exception but a governing rationality. Risk becomes an alibi, informality a weapon, and uncertainty itself a mode of control.

The talk also examines how residents insist on presence through staying put, rebuilding on rubble, mapping themselves into visibility, and crafting alternative plans for urban life, even when legal remedies fail. These practices constitute what Agbiboa calls ‘refusal without redemption,’ a politics oriented not toward final resolution but toward present-oriented survival and the  labor of carrying on regardless.

By bringing Lagos into conversation with broader debates on climate urbanism, law, displacement, and urban citizenship, the talk invited reflection on a pressing question for legal scholarship. What does justice look like when law itself governs through dispossession, and what forms of political life persist when redemption through law is no longer available?

About the Speaker

Daniel E. Agbiboa is Associate Professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University, where he also serves as Faculty Associate of the Weatherhead Centre for International Affairs, Affiliate Faculty of the Bloomberg Centre for Cities, and Co-Chair of the Urban Conversation Series in the Mahindra Humanities Center.

Prof. Agbiboa’s research focuses on the intersection of violence and order, urban governance, mobility and mobilisation, environmental politics, empire and African subjectivity. His works are grounded in discourse analysis, mobile ethnography, and a critical ethnography of the state. He is the author of They Eat Our Sweat: Transport Labor, Corruption and Everyday Survival in Urban Nigeria (Oxford University Press, 2022) and Mobility, Mobilisation and Counter/Insurgency: The Routes of Terror in an African Context; editor of Transport, Transgression and Politics in African Cities: The Rhythm of Chaos (Routledge, 2019); and co-editor of People, Predicaments and Potentials in Africa (Langaa RPCIG).

He is the recipient of several prestigious (book and article) awards, including the Lee Ann Fujii Book Award given by the International Studies Association (ISA); the ISA Peace Best Book Award; finalist for both the Society for Economic Anthropology (SEA) Best Book Prize and the Global Development Studies (GDS) Best Book Award; the Politics and Gender Best Article Award given by editors of Politics and Gender journal (published by Cambridge University Press) and the Women, Gender and Politics Section of APSA; and the 2023 James F. Short Jr. Distinguished Article Award (Honorable Mention) given by the Crime, Law and Deviance Section of the American Sociological Association. In 2023, Professor Agbiboa received the Clarence Stone Scholar Award, given by the Urban and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association (APSA) for his significant contributions to the study of urban politics. He has been a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, fellow of the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, recipient of the Guggenheim Distinguished Scholar Award, and holder of the CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholar Award (2024-2026). He currently serves on the Editorial Board of the African Studies Review and the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, where he also serves as a Trustee.

Gallery

‘AI In The Everyday In India’ | A Socio Legal Workshop by the JSW Centre for the Future of Law at NLSIU, University of Amsterdam, Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies at the University of Warwick, and Tilburg University

The JSW Centre for the Future of Law at NLSIU, along with University of Amsterdam, Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies at the University of Warwick, and Tilburg University, is organising a socio-legal workshop titled ‘AI in the everyday in India’ on Saturday, January 10, 2026.

This event is open to the public, register here to attend on campus. Join online here.

Concept Note

AI and the Everyday in India brings together scholars working on everyday negotiations with AI enabled algorithmic governance in policing, surveillance of public places, welfare provisions, control of borders in the Indian context marked by either the absence of legal, regulatory frameworks or gaps between the law and lived realities of experiences with AI.

The workshop will generate conceptual frameworks and methodological tools for studying AI and the everyday in a comparative perspective that considers generalisable similarities even while being mindful of the unique histories and socio-political dynamics that shape the implementation and reception of AI technologies in India. The discussions will develop the network of scholars exploring the everyday life of AI in the global south.

Programme

10.00 – 10.15 am: Introduction and Welcome
Siddharth de Souza, Sagnik Dutta, Rahul Hemrajani, and Siddharth M

10.15 am – 12.15 pm: AI related challenges to democracy and justice
Chair: Rahul Hemrajani
Discussants: Sagnik Dutta and Siddharth M

  • Antecedents as Precedents? Exploring the Interoperable Criminal Justice System (ICJS) in India – Nupur Chowdhury
  • Law, Ethics, and AI in Urban Traffic Enforcement: The Case Study of Delhi NCR of India – Rajesh Kumar
  • Watching the Republic: A Critical Policy Analysis of AI-Enabled Government Surveillance in India – Nikhil Purohit
  • Democratic Backsliding in the Global Majority: Wading Through the Swamp of AI Slop – Anmol Diwan

12.15 – 1.15: Lunch

1.15 – 3.45 pm: Governance, Human rights and Infrastructures of AI
Chair:
Siddharth de Souza
Discussants: Rahul Hemrajani and Siddharth M

  • When Infrastructure becomes Governance: Rethinking Law’s Role in India’s Digital health Project – Anamika Kundu
  • Ecologies of AI in India – Preeti Raghunath and Suriya Krishna B S
  • ‘Who’ is involved in governing AI in India and ‘how’?: The role of state and non-state actors – Devyani Pande
  • AI and Human Rights: A posthuman conundrum – Manpreet Singh
  • Inclusion, Innovation and AI in/for Law in India’ – Krishna Ravi Srinivas

3.45 – 4.00 pm: Tea and coffee

4.00 – 6.00 pm: Imaginations and futures of AI
Chair:
Sagnik Dutta
Discussants: Siddharth de Souza and Rahul Hemrajani

  • From Assembly to Algorithm: Constitutional Intelligibility and Self-Respect in the Age of AI – Shaunna Rodrigues
  • The Masculine Rhythm of Algorithmic Solutions and the Future of Collective Political Imagination – Debangana Chatterjee
  • Decolonising AI Personhood: Designing a Framework for the Future – Shrawani Shagun and Sanchet Sharma
  • Building AI Futures from Below: Centering youth voices to build equitable and accountable AI – Bhawna Parmar

6.00 – 6.30 pm: Conclusion
Siddharth M, Rahul Hemrajani, Sagnik Dutta and Siddharth de Souza

NLS Comes to Kochi | Open House | NLS BA (Hons) Programme

We invite curious and interested students, parents, schools, and career counsellors, to the open house on the NLS BA (Hons) programme at Kochi on Saturday, January 17, 2026.

This conversation will revolve around BA education and practice, focussing on the multidisciplinary curriculum and pedagogy of what NLS has to offer in this programme. The session will be hosted from 11 am to 1 pm. It is intended to guide students in their Class XI and XII in making an informed decision about their higher education journey.

The open house will be conducted by our faculty members Dr. Anindita Adhikari, NLS BA (Hons) Vice Chair and Assistant Professor of Social Science, and Dr. Megha Sharma, Assistant Professor of Social Science.

Kindly register ahead for the open house by filling out this form.

About the NLS BA (Hons) Programme

NLSIU pioneered and developed an integrated 5-year BA LLB (Hons.) degree that transformed Indian legal education. Several NLS graduates have pursued further degrees in humanities, social sciences, and business and then embarked on very successful careers in these fields.

As NLSIU develops into a multi-disciplinary university, in line with national and state education policies, the NLS BA (Hons.) programme draws on 35 years of experience in offering the integrated 5-year BA LLB (Hons.) programme. The NLS BA (Hons.) programme curriculum has been carefully designed by faculty teams after extensive stakeholder consultations with eminent academics and practitioners from across the country’s top universities to provide their inputs and advice on the curriculum.

Our faculty come from leading universities within India and beyond. We have faculty strength in the following areas:

  • History: Modern South Asia, Urban History, Labour History, Global History, Post-Independent India, Development and Planning, Indian National Movement (19th and 20th century)
  • Politics: Western Political Thought, Tagore, Gandhi, Periyar and Indian Political Thought, Political Economy, Urban Politics, Land, Indigeneity, Political Parties, The Indian State and Democracy, Comparative Methods in Political Research
  • Sociology and Anthropology: Social Theory, Caste and Tribe, Capitalisms, Development, Land Politics, Cinema and Popular Culture, Religion, Urban Anthropology, Ecology
  • Economics: Development Economics, Environmental Economics, Labour Economics, Econometrics, Microeconomics, Macroeconomics, History of Economic Thought, Game Theory

Our faculty have rich research agendas and publication records across law and the social sciences which will inform classroom teaching and learning.

Read more about the programme.

For any queries regarding NLSAT, please write to

For outreach sessions at your school or college, please write to  

Reflections from the ‘PPEL in the Global South’ Conference | Dec 11-14, 2025

The annual conference ‘PPEL in the Global South,’ focussed on Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and Law, was held from December 11-14, 2025, at the NLSIU campus. The primary objective of the conference was to provide a visible platform for scholars from India and other regions of the Global South to engage in sustained dialogue with peers from across the world. It also aimed to contribute to building a coherent intellectual community in India across philosophy, law, political theory, economics, and related disciplines.

About the Conference

The conference brought together 65 participants from universities across India, South Asia, Southeast Asia, North America, Europe, the UK, and Australia. A total of 59 papers were presented across 22 thematically organised panels. Panel themes included, among others, AI and Ethics, Free Speech, Structural Wrongs and Power, New Directions in Law, Constitutional Law in the Global South, Economic Competition and Exploitation, and Rethinking Political Theory in India.

Reflecting the objectives of the conference, participants represented diverse career stages as well as institutional and disciplinary backgrounds. The conference included 15 PhD scholars and participants from 23 Indian universities and 28 universities abroad, spanning the Global North and South. In addition, two special sessions were organised for NLSIU students on Navigating Academic Careers and Writing and Publishing in philosophy, the social sciences, and law. Several NLSIU faculty members participated as presenters and moderators, alongside students, particularly from the NLS BA (Hons.) and BA LL.B. (Hons.) programmes, who were actively involved as student organisers.

The final day of the conference featured an open roundtable discussion on the outcomes and future directions of the PPEL network. Participants agreed to establish a formal mailing list to sustain the network, organise a series of smaller workshops in both online and offline formats, and initiate a mentorship programme involving early-career and senior scholars. The possibility of special journal issues based on thematic groupings of conference papers was also discussed.

Overall, the philosophical anchoring of the conference enabled dialogue among participants from diverse disciplinary backgrounds and affirmed the importance of collaborative and interdisciplinary research across philosophy, politics, economics, and law.

Here is the full schedule.

Reflections from the Organisers

Kritika Maheshwari
Assistant Professor, TU Delft

The idea of the PPEL in the Global South Conference stemmed from a form of frustration that I felt while having an academic career in Europe for more than 10 years now, where I felt there was a missing space for people to talk about real philosophical and political issues about the Global South with Global South scholars. And I transferred my frustration to many of my other colleagues, including Bastian, and pitched this idea of hosting a conference of this nature somewhere in India.

I would like to thank our main collaborators at NLS, Dr. Dayal Paleri and Sidharth Chauhan, who have been our biggest support in helping us not just plan the entire conference, but also help us so smoothly execute over the last couple of months together.

And besides that, we also managed to find a lot of support outside of India with institutions like International Network for Economic Method (INEM), the University of Hong Kong and Purdue University. They supported us financially, ensuring that we were able to help scholars and students from across India to come here and participate.

Bastian Steuwer
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Ashoka University

I’ve found that often when I talk to people in Europe, people are interested in talking about issues of the Global South and they’re interested to learn more. There is goodwill but there aren’t many opportunities for people to engage and to learn and to understand more about issues as they would arise from the Global South. And so, we were hoping to get some of the people that have the goodwill and that are interested in trying to change the status quo a little bit and facilitate a step forward in those conversations for those people who are interested and willing.

One of the things we quickly agreed upon was that we wanted to make it about a 50-50 split between people from outside of India and people from within India, and that worked out quite well. We also tried to find a good mix between more established and junior academics. The idea was to have early career academics along with those with more established careers and reputations, so that they could connect and learn from each other. 

We decided to focus on PPEL to look at disciplines that engage in some form of normative reasoning. We had a lot of moral and political philosophy talks. We also had political theory talks, talks about Indian political theory, and what it means to do Indian political theory in the first place. We had talks by normative economists. We also obviously, at a law university, had talks by legal scholars.

Reflections from Participants

David Estlund
Lombardo Family Professor of Philosophy, Brown University

I was delighted to attend the PPEL conference. I gave a talk which led to a fantastic discussion which was very useful to me. The title of my talk was ‘Is Purely Structural Wrong an Illusion?’ The basic problem that I talked about was this somewhat mysterious idea that’s very influential. That social structure itself can be wrong, irrespective of any individual wrongdoing. On one hand, that’s a little bit of an obscure idea, but on the other hand, there’s something funny about the cases that we’re invited to think are ‘wrong’ in this way. Even though the ‘wrong’ is not supposed to be by agents, the cases that look a lot like cases would look if they were by agents. And so, I argued that’s why they seem ‘wrong.’ And it was a very useful discussion, and the whole conference has been extremely useful with fascinating discussions. And I’ve always wanted to get to India, and this is the perfect way to do it, so I’m glad to have been here.

Heng Ying
PhD Fellow, University of Hong Kong

It was a great honour to be here and present at the first PPEL Global South Conference. My talk was on ‘Moral Progress as a Discourse.’ I challenge how philosophers prescribe how we should make progress from this perspective of thinking. I think the kind of style philosophers promote in their works has some problems that we should be aware of. So that’s a part of my ongoing research. I think what matters more is how we preserve our ethical freedom, the freedom to think about alternative forms of society and be able to pursue that. I really enjoyed the conversation at the session. People raised great questions, some which really helped me think about the image I had in my head about improving society. The people here were really nice and supportive. I really enjoyed being here and thank you so much.

Jaya Ray
Associate Professor of Philosophy, Lakshmibai College, University of Delhi

I discussed my paper ‘Too Many People: Ethics of Procreation and Population Control.’ In my paper, I try to see the problem of overpopulation and over consumption as an ethical issue in population ethics. I base my argument on the ethics of procreation, and I try to give a philosophical foundation for the debate between procreative autonomy and intergenerational justice. I explore how they interplay with each other with a lot of philosophical arguments as both are very strong, intuitive fundamental values. I ask: is there any solution we can reach?

Nicole Hassoun
Professor, Indiana University

I was excited to be at the PPEL Conference in Bengaluru. I presented on inequality measurement in a talk titled ‘Measuring and Mitigating Inequality: A New Sufficiency and Equity Based Approach.’ I have a new measure that looks at how much people have over an income distribution and how inequalities matter more when people are less well-off below some threshold. And so, I’m hoping it’ll be useful to other academics, researchers. I had a great time at the conference meeting all kinds of interesting people doing really good work. So, thanks for having me!

Tarun Menon
Faculty, Azim Premji University

I presented my work related to power, trying to understand how power structures work and how one can use empirical data to infer whether or not there’s a power structure in some part of society. I was very happy with the response to the talk, the questions and the way people talked about it. It’s really great to have people from a variety of disciplines, to get feedback on your work from them. I really think the way the conference has been shaping up has been extremely encouraging. It’s been extremely successful so far. All of the talks have been really insightful and I’m grateful to the University and to the organisers for putting together such a smooth and intellectually stimulating conference.

Hin Sing Yuen
PhD Candidate, TU Delft

I was very happy to be here at the PPEL Conference in Bengaluru. My presentation was titled ‘Becoming Humanity: Reconceiving Humanity and Existential Risk through a Buddhist Lens.’ In this talk, I explored the concept of humanity in the context of extinction ethics and population ethics. I really enjoyed my time here in Bengaluru. The arrangements were amazing. Everything ran very smoothly. The lunch here was amazing and yeah, I’m enjoying some tea and snacks here. Thank you so much for organising this.

Gallery