News Type: Event

The Chair on Consumer Law and Practice, NLSIU, in collaboration with online dispute resolution platform JustAct, is hosting an online webinar on ‘Mediation Landscape in India – History So Far and Way Forward’ on March 7, 2025, at 6 PM.

About the session

In an era where alternative dispute resolution is gaining momentum, understanding the mediation landscape is more critical than ever. This session will delve into the historical evolution of mediation in India and explore what lies ahead.

Speaker: Retired Justice Kannan Krishnamoorthy, High Court of Punjab & Haryana
Moderator: Mr. Arnav Sharma, Assistant Professor of Law, NLSIU

Join in to learn from legal experts and industry leaders.

🔗 Register here or by scanning the QR code in the image!

Welcome back! We are beginning this trimester’s faculty seminar with a guest presentation by Dr. Renuka Sane and Bhavin Patel from TrustBridge, an organization that works on rule of law and the economy. They will be presenting their paper titled ‘Balancing Power and Accountability: An Evaluation of SEBI’s Adjudication of Insider Trading’ on March 5, 2025, at the Ground Floor Conference Hall at NLSIU’s Training Centre.

Abstract

The paper evaluates the Securities Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) orders on insider trading matters over a 15-year period, and the performance of the orders in appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). The paper develops an evaluation framework based on elements of the rule of law applicable to regulatory adjudication and finds that in a large number of orders SEBI does not follow the standards laid down in its own laws. The paper also evaluates how these orders have fared at the SAT, and finds an overall appeal rate between 30-38%.This is likely to be higher as orders appealed in more recent years will not have been completed, and hence the data on them is unavailable. Once appealed almost 60% of orders are modified – that is they are either fully or partially allowed, or the sanction amount is modified. The frequent setbacks suggest that sebi may need to rethink its approach to enforcement. Finally, the paper makes some suggestions grounded in legal theory on how SEBI could improve its order-writing process.

About the Speakers

Dr. Renuka Sane is Managing Director at TrustBridge. Before joining TrustBridge, she was an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP). Her research interests are in household finance, especially on household choice in financial instruments such as credit, pensions, insurance and equity markets, as well as consumer protection in finance. She also has interests in research and policy on the criminal justice system in India.

Dr. Sane was a peer reviewer for the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) on consumer protection. She was also on the research team for the Bankruptcy Legislative Reforms Committee (BLRC) on the insolvency of individuals (2015) and the research team for the DEA Committee on Mis-selling (2015). She is also a member of the Pension Advisory Committee of the Pension Fund Regulatory Development Authority (PFRDA). Dr. Sane has a PhD in Economics from the University of New South Wales and holds an M.A. in Economics from Mumbai University.

Bhavin Patel is Programme Director at TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation. At TrustBridge, Bhavin manages the Regulatory Governance project, which involves a technology-assisted analysis of regulatory orders at scale.

Bhavin Patel has two decades’ experience across the legal, technology, and education industries. He successfully helped launch and scale two start-ups, and is now working on his third venture. He has worked across in-house legal departments (ITC Ltd., IDfy), and law firms (DSK Legal, Aureus Law Partners), primarily in the area of commercial legal advisory services. Bhavin has been part of the founding team of start-ups that provide services to the legal industry (LST, Rainmaker, Bayside Tech).

Bhavin specialises in privacy laws, and has a deep interest in the intersection between law and technology, and the fundamental logical principles and methods underlying both. Along with his law firm experience, he routinely advises clients on data protection issues, KYC, AML, CFT, and general corporate matters and commercial contracts. His area of expertise includes devising privacy strategies for businesses involved in the collection, processing, and storage of personal data.

Reflections from the seminar

Bhavin Patel, Programme Director, TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation said:

“I’d like to thank the NLSIU faculty community for the opportunity to present our paper titled ‘Balancing Power and Accountability: An Evaluation of SEBIs Adjudication of Insider Trading’ at the faculty seminar. The paper evaluates the Securities Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) orders on insider trading matters over a 15-year period and the performance of the orders in appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). We have used a combination of methods, including LLMs to create our dataset, and we hope to release our paper and dataset shortly.

The comments and feedback we received at the seminar are of immense help to us in refining our arguments and finalising the paper. We had the chance to speak with faculty across a range of subjects, from administrative law to capital markets law, and this well-rounded, wide-ranging set of observations has been of critical value to us.

We look forward to engaging more with the NLSIU community, and to bringing our future work to this forum as well.”

Gallery

Guest speaker Dr. Natalie Sedacca of Durham University will present the fifth chapter of her book project at the faculty seminar on January 22, 2025, at the Ground Floor Conference Hall at NLSIU’s Training Centre.

Abstract

A central construction in the devaluation of domestic work is the presentation of paid domestic workers as akin to members of their employer’s family, which is highly gendered and masks deeply unequal relationships, overlapping with marginalisation based on factors like race / ethnicity, caste, migration status and class. This devaluation is manifested through legal frameworks excluding domestic workers from protections applicable to other sectors, including on minimum wages. This chapter examines devaluation and its manifestations in light of doctrinal and empirical material from four countries: Chile, the UK, South Africa, and India. It argues that while the familial discourse is complex and some workers may identify with it, its overall impact is to perpetuate devaluation, for example, in minimising workers’ demands for improvements and extracting additional work from them. It also examines how a lack of recognition of skills and complexity contribute to devaluation and discusses social reproduction theory as a route towards better valuation of domestic work.

The chapter assesses the extent of domestic workers’ exclusion from rights to minimum wage or key social security provisions applicable in other sectors, arguing that better regulation of these areas to include domestic work generally works against devaluation. Drawing on the case study material, it identifies three broad trends: the relatively strong regulatory framework with countervailing factors maintaining devaluation in Chile and South Africa; the familial discourse and relations of servitude in India; and devaluation based on an exemption from minimum wage that existed for some live-in domestic workers until recently in the UK. The final section explores the role and potential of human rights law in counteracting devaluation, including through recognition of the value of domestic work in findings of forced labour where pay has been denied, and challenges to exclusionary frameworks using indirect discrimination. Beyond equalisation with existing frameworks, I examine the arguably stronger right to a living wage and to fair pay, which is derived from social rights instruments, arguing for an approach to these rights that properly accounts for the value of feminised domestic work.

About the Speaker

Dr. Natalie Sedacca is an Assistant Professor in Employment Law at Durham University.

Her research focuses on human rights and labour law, with a particular interest in domestic workers and other marginalised workers, and in issues of gender and migration. Her PhD, completed at UCL in 2021, analysed the legal position of domestic workers and their frequent exclusion from protective labour law legislation in relation to two case studies, Chile and the UK, and criticised this from a human rights perspective. Natalie is now working on a book project arising from the PhD, which also includes case studies of South Africa and India.

Natalie has been a co-investigator on a funded project conducted as an equal partnership between NGOs and academics about the effects of conditions for agricultural and care work visas in the UK on workers’ vulnerabilities to trafficking and other forms of modern-day slavery. Natalie’s other research projects include: the human rights implications of the ‘hostile environment’ for migrant women; the rights of domestic and childcare workers in the ‘gig economy;’ and addressing violence and harassment at work.

Natalie is on the Research Committee for the Society of Legal Scholars and was previously the joint convenor for its Labour Law section from 2021 – 24. Natalie is a trustee for the migrant domestic worker NGO Kalayaan and is on the Executive Committee of Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights.

Before entering academia, Natalie was a solicitor specialising in claims against the police and public authorities. She practised in this area for seven years post-qualification.

Reflections from the Speaker

“I am delighted to be visiting NSLIU, Bengaluru for the first time, and am very grateful to Dr. Saurabh Bhattacharjee and the Centre of Labour Studies for hosting me. I am currently working on a book project on the rights of domestic workers and the relevance of human rights law to challenging a lack of protection, which includes India as one of its case studies. I was introduced to NSLIU following a visit by my Durham colleague Dr. Clara Martins-Pereira and was particularly drawn to the Centre for Labour Studies, whose work overlaps in with my research interests on various topics such as informal work, precarious employment and forced labour. Since arriving at NSLIU, it has been very illuminating for me to meet with Centre members and hear more about their projects, which I hope will lead to future research collaborations.

In the Faculty Seminar on 22 January 2025, kindly organised by Ammel Sharon, I presented a draft of chapter five of my book project, entitled ‘The Devaluation of Domestic Work: Regulatory Reform and Challenges to the Perception of a ‘Family-Like’ Relationship.’ This chapter examines the ways in which a presentation of paid domestic workers as akin to members of their employer’s family devalues domestic work, overlapping with factors such as race, migration status and class. I examine how these discourses of devaluation overlap with regulatory regimes drawing on doctrinal and empirical material from four countries: Chile, the UK, South Africa, and India. The chapter also explores the role and potential of human rights law in counteracting devaluation and challenging exclusionary frameworks.

It was extremely helpful to receive feedback on my draft from legal academics and social scientists at NSLIU, ranging from technical comments on Indian law to conceptual questions on defining work and its value.”

Gallery