Bangalore Little Theatre’s ‘The Prophet and the Poet’ | Performance at the NLS Campus

We are delighted to announce that Bangalore Little Theatre, the city’s oldest English-language theatre group, will be performing their acclaimed play ‘The Prophet and the Poet’.  The performance is being organised by NLSIU’s Student Bar Association as part of this year’s Independence Day celebrations on campus.

Synopsis

The Prophet and the Poet is based on the exchange of letters and articles between Mahatma Gandhi and Rabindranath Tagore over a 25 year period, with the Indian freedom struggle as the backdrop. The letters reveal how the two personalities differed significantly on the form and content of the freedom movement with their differences widening over the years. However, the depth of their personalities maintained genuine respect for each other in spite of deep differences on ideological grounds, reflecting the political maturity of those times in India.

Attendees are expected to be seated by 5:50 pm. Theatre etiquette will be followed, so all attendees are requested to keep their phones on silent mode and avoid disruptions once the performance begins.

With this performance, the University hopes to make this the start of a vibrant culture of theatre & drama at NLS!

Workshop on ‘Inequality and Governance’ | By NLSIU & Brown University

The Centre for the Study of Social Inclusion at NLSIU, in collaboration with Brown University, is hosting a workshop on ‘Inequality and Governance’ on August 14, 2025.

About the Workshop

This one day workshop will bring together a group scholars working on themes of inequality, development and governance to share ongoing research at various stages. These could be research proposals, article drafts and chapters from a book project. The workshop is being organised around two panels with four papers and a discussant assigned to each. Each presenter will have up to 20 minutes to present their work. This will be followed by 15 minutes for comments from the discussant and Q&A from other participants. In the final session, there will be a discussion on next steps for putting together a series of such workshops over the next two years, ideas for publications and other ideas for institutional collaborations.

Caste and Development 

The articulation of caste has played a critical role in shaping the development trajectory of modern and contemporary India. Far from being a static remnant of a premodern social order, caste is now increasingly recognised as a dynamic and enduring structure that interacts with, and often underpins, key aspects of India’s political economy. It is pertinent to note that caste should not be viewed as antithetical to capitalist modernity or the functioning of modern market economies. Rather, it remains a salient force that intersects with class, labour, and institutional arrangements in  complex and historically contingent ways.

Recent scholarship has significantly expanded the understanding of caste beyond its conventional framing within discourses of exclusion, discrimination, protest, and social reform. Contemporary studies have begun to examine caste as an active agent in India’s development experience—shaping and being shaped by processes such as capitalist modernisation, the expansion of welfare schemes, and the evolution of democratic governance. These works demonstrate how caste structures mediate access to state resources, economic mobility, and public representation, thereby influencing patterns of inclusion and inequality in the context of development. Moreover, this body of research situates caste within the broader historical frameworks of colonial rule and postcolonial state formation, analysing how institutional arrangements—from colonial bureaucracies to constitutional mandates—have both challenged and reinforced caste hierarchies. It also brings to light the ways in which caste continues to inform labour relations, patterns of employment, and market participation, particularly in informal and agrarian economies.

By reorienting the study of caste toward its entanglements with development, capitalism, and institutional governance, these contributions offer a more comprehensive and empirically grounded account of how social stratification persists and transforms in contemporary India. This expanded analytical approach enables a deeper understanding of how caste operates not simply as a cultural or social identity, but as a key axis of political economy and governance.

The workshop invites papers that explore the enduring influence of caste in shaping the trajectory of  development and social policy in contemporary India. It especially encourages papers focussed on empirically grounded studies, which examines how caste operates across rural and urban contexts, development programmes, and state interventions and across sectors such as education, health, employment, land, and welfare.

Governance and Local Democracy

Over the past three decades, India has undergone profound transformations in its governance architecture, marked by significant attempts at democratic deepening, social policy expansion, and reconfiguring of centre-state dynamics. This panel explores the evolving landscape of governance and democracy in India through the lens of decentralisation, fiscal federalism, and rights-based development, while grappling with contemporary challenges such as climate change and socioeconomic inequality.

The decentralisation reforms of the 1990s sought to institutionalise grassroots democracy through the Panchayati Raj system and urban local bodies. However their outcomes remain uneven, shaped by varying state capacities, elite capture, and the complexities of federal governance. The rights-based social policies of the early 2000s directed significant funds and functionaries downwards, introduced new platforms for citizen oversight and grievance redress and have been accompanied  by expanding financial inclusion infrastructure and large-scale digitalisation. This has increased the institutional presence of the local state and state-citizen interactions in myriad new ways. Fiscal federalism has played a central role in mediating these transformations, especially as demands on state and local governments have increased in the context of decentralisation and welfare delivery. The evolving role of institutions such as the Finance Commission and centrally sponsored schemes reflects ongoing tensions over resource sharing, autonomy, and accountability between the Centre and states. These challenges are further compounded by the climate crisis, which demands coordinated but locally embedded responses.

The papers in this panel study how complex interplays of routine and exception emerge amidst the institutional reforms and expanding terrain of formal entitlements alongside persistent inequalities and thriving informal structures of mediation. The papers will address the governance challenges  and encounters between the state and citizens through the lens of a specific social policy or set of policies or a cross-cutting institutional reform. Papers are also encouraged to pay particular attention to how governance structures respond to both social and ecological vulnerabilities. This panel invites papers that examine linkages between institutional reform and democratic deepening. How did decentralisation alter political competition and the exercise of citizenship at the local  level? To what extent did fiscal federalism enable states and local governments to adapt social policy to local needs? Did rights-based social policies reinforce or bypass local democratic institutions? What is the evolving role of local governments in an era of increasing centralisation and digital governance

Faculty Co-organisers

Agenda

Panel 1: Caste and Development | 10:15 AM  to 1 PM

  • Paper title: ‘Old Problem in a New Place: Redlining of Ex-Untouchable Ghettos’
    Presenter: Dr. Jusmeet Sihra, University of Cambridge
    Discussant: Dr. Sushmita Pati, NLSIU
  • Paper title: ‘Music as Political: Rethinking anti-caste politics through a cultural interface’
    Presenter: Dr. K Kalyani, Azim Premji University
    Discussant: Dr. Karthikeyan Damodaran, NLSIU
  • Paper title: ‘Entrepreneurship and marginalised social identities in India’
    Presenter: Dr. Angarika Rakshit, NLSIU
    Discussant: Dr. Aniket Nandan, NLSIU
  • Paper title: ‘Caste and Development: Tracking Dalit social mobility within the realm of Dravidian social justice’
    Presenter: Dr. Karthikeyen Damodaran, NLSIU
    Discussant: Dr. Swati Narayan, NLSIU

Panel 2: Governance and Local Democracy | 3 PM to 5 PM

  • Paper title: ‘The Political Economy of Federalism: Regional inequality and fiscal transfers in India’
    Presenter: Dr. A Kalaiyarasan, Madras Institute of Development Studies
    Discussant: Dr. Srikrishna Ayyangar, NLSIU
  • Paper title: ‘Planetary Temporalities: Framing ‘Urgency’ in Disaster Management’
    Presenter: Dr. Sudheesh RC, NLSIU
    Discussant: Dr. Anindita Adhikari, NLSIU
  • Paper title: ‘Forest rights, displacement and political economy of development: A qualitative analysis of relocated tribals from Satpura Tiger Reserve’
    Presenter: Dr. Shiuli Vanaja, NLSIU
    Discussant: Radhika Chitkara, NSLIU
  • Paper title: ‘Learning to Lead: The uneven advance of power-sharing in the panchayat’
    Presenter: Dr. Anisha George, Azim Premji University
    Discussant: Prof. Patrick Heller, Brown University

Reflections

Dr. Jusmeet Sihra, University of Cambridge

“I want to thank NLSIU, and especially Anindita and Aniket, for providing this platform and for their very warm hospitality! I spent two extremely stimulating days there and learnt so much on inequality across its various dimensions and how to govern it. I clearly see myself coming again at NLSIU in the near-future to interact more in detail with colleagues.
These intellectual interactions are quintessential for producing new, cutting-edge scholarship. Without such exchanges, we simply cannot thrive in academia. The possibilities for future collaboration are many now in various forms and formats such as panels in international conferences, edited volumes, special issues, and individual collaborations.”

Dr. K Kalyani, Azim Premji University

“I feel the workshop was well organized with an interesting set of interdisciplinary conversations that was facilitated. It was nice to have conversations with NLS faculties as well as with invited guests to meditate upon the diverse aspects of caste studies. Looking forward, I see this cohort growing facilitating more conversations. I appreciate the organisers’ time and effort to conduct this.”

Dr. Karthikeyan Damodaran, NLSIU

“The workshop was a great effort bringing in scholars who work on related themes but not confined to a particular discipline as the participants were from different disciplines. Another important aspect is that, most of them were from geographically closer regions, this provides the possibility of having such collaborations in the future too to read each other’s work, give valuable comments, suggestions and exchange ideas. It was also nice to have a veteran sociologist in the form of Patrick Heller who was very participative and approachable.”

Dr. Swati Narayan, NLSIU

“It was a wonderful exchange of ideas and hope it ignites the spark for many more.”

Related Event

Panel Discussion | Report on ‘Citizenship, Inequality and Urban Governance: A Study of Indian Cities’

Panel Discussion | Report on ‘Citizenship, Inequality and Urban Governance: A Study of Indian Cities’

NLSIU hosted a panel discussion with Prof. Patrick Heller, Prof. Ashutosh Varshney and Dr. Siddharth Swaminathan from Brown University, United States, in which they presented the findings from their latest report titled ‘Citizenship, Inequality and Urban Governance: A Study of Indian Cities.’

About the Report

Published by the Saxena Center for Contemporary South Asia at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, the report presents the results of a comparative study of 14 cities (and 31803 households) where it probes in detail two kinds of contemporary urban experiences in India. First, it explores how India’s urban citizens relate to the state and how the state provides basic public services to them, and second, how citizens interact with one another, whether their social interactions extend beyond their own caste and religious communities, their patterns of participation, and how they view issues of citizen equality and freedom.

Read the Report

About the Speakers

Panellists:

  1. Prof. Patrick Heller, Professor of International and Public Affairs and Sociology, Brown University
  2. Prof. Ashutosh Varshney, Professor of International Studies and the Social Sciences, Brown University
  3. Dr. Siddharth Swaminathan, Visiting Research Associate, Saxena Center for Contemporary South Asia, Brown University

Discussants:

  1. Dr. Sushmita Pati, Associate Professor, Social Science, NLSIU
  2. Dr. Angarika Rakshit, Assistant Professor, Social Science, NLSIU

Agenda

  • Welcome Remarks | 5 PM
  • Panel 1: Basic Service Delivery, Segregation and Inequality | 5:05 PM – 6:20 PM
    • Presentation by the Panellists (40 mins)
    • Comments by the Discussant: Dr. Angarika Rakshit, Assistant Professor, Social Science, NLSIU (20 mins)
    • Q&A (15 mins)
  • Tea/Coffee Break (10 mins)
  • Panel 2: Participation, Social Interactions and Governance | 6:30 PM – 8 PM
    • Presentation by the Panellists (40 mins)
    • Comments by the Discussant: Dr. Sushmita Pati, Associate Professor, Social Science, NLSIU (20 mins)
    • Q&A (15 mins)
  • Closing remarks (10 minus)

Related Event

Workshop on ‘Inequality and Governance’ | By NLSIU & Brown University

SLR Reading Circle | ‘Trials of Sovereignty’ by Alastair McClure

NLSIU’s Socio-Legal Review (SLR), an open-access, student-run journal, organised the second iteration of the SLR Reading Circle. This trimester, through the course of four sessions, the reading circle closely read and engaged with Alastair McClure’s recent book, ‘Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857–1922.’

Sessions

Session 1: August 13, 2025 | 4:30 to 5: 30 PM
Speaker: Dr. Samyak Ghosh, Assistant Professor, Social Science, NLSIU
This session dived deep into chapter 1 of the book

Session 2: August 20, 2025 | 4 PM to 5 PM
Speaker: Dr. Mrinal Satish, Professor of Law & Dean – Research, NLSIU
This session focussed on chapter 3 of the book

Session 3: September 10, 2025 | 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM
Speaker: Alastair McClure, Assistant Professor, Department of History, The University of Hong Kong
This session was held virtually to discuss the book generally, with a specific focus on the introduction

About the Book

‘Trials of Sovereignty’ offers the first legal history of mercy and discretion in nineteenth and twentieth-century India. Through a study of large-scale amnesties, the prerogative powers of pardon, executive commutation, and judicial sentencing practices, Alastair McClure argues that discretion represented a vital facet of colonial rule. In a bloody penal order, officials and judges consistently offered reduced sentences and pardons for select subjects, encouraging others to approach state institutions and confer the colonial state with greater legitimacy. Mercy was always a contested expression of sovereign power that risked exposing colonial weakness. This vulnerability was gradually recognized by colonial subjects who deployed a range of legal and political strategies to interrogate state power and question the lofty promises of British colonial justice. By the early twentieth century, the decision to break the law and reject imperial overtures of mercy had developed into a crucial expression of anticolonial politics.

About the Author

Alastair McClure is a legal historian of modern South Asia and the British Empire with research interests that focus largely on the history of criminal law and state violence. His most recent publications have included studies of courtroom archives, corporal punishment, capital punishment, and censorship. This research has been supported by grants from the Arts and Humanities Research Council, the British Academy, and the University Grants Council, Hong Kong. Before joining the University of Hong Kong, he completed postdoctoral fellowships at McGill University and the University of Chicago. Between September to December of 2023 he was an ICAS:MP research fellow based in New Delhi. He also acts as the co-convenor of the Asian Legal History Seminar Series, hosted by the Department of History and the Faculty of Law, and is an associate editor for Law and History Review.

About SLR Reading Circle

This initiative explored the law as a lived, contested, and evolving institution—one that is shaped by and shapes a range of social, cultural, political, and economic forces. These sessions sought to not only foreground law’s multiple meanings but also questioned of method and discipline.

Gallery

NLS Faculty Seminar | ‘Can Making A Law Be Playful? A Case For Designing For Democratic Deliberation in India’

In this week’s faculty seminar Varsha Aithala, Assistant Professor of Law, presented a paper titled ‘Can making a law be playful? A case for designing for democratic deliberation in India,’ with co-authors Siddharth Peter de Souza and Saumya Varma.

Siddharth Peter de Souza is the founder of Justice Adda, a law and design social venture in India. He is also an Assistant Professor in AI and Society at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, University of Warwick. Saumya Varma, a senior consultant with Justice Adda, is a public policy professional with a background in legislative research and strategic consulting.

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of legal design as an imaginative and playful approach to developing, understanding, and disseminating law. Through a case study that discusses the development of a board game project titled ‘Sabha’ which is the outcome of a multi-year project by Justice Adda developed in partnership with the Hanns Seidel Stiftung, the paper explores what design can do to build meaningful deliberation in democratic societies. ‘Sabha’ is designed as a print-and-play interactive multiplayer board game. It seeks to immerse players in the ‘world’ of the Indian Parliament, and to inform and educate players about Parliamentary procedures, the roles and responsibilities of parliamentary representatives, and the process of law-making. The paper contextualises the need for ‘Sabha’ within the evolution of the Indian parliament and its relationship with the people it represents. By discussing concepts of ‘playful’ pedagogy in the development of the game, the paper explains that the value of using legal design in this process of game design. It argues that such an approach is valuable to not only to think beyond the typical form of the law, but also to be free of the typical spaces of the law.

Gallery

Guest Lecture on Litigation Skills & Strategic Advocacy by Senior Advocate Shri Udaya Holla

The Student Initiative for Promotion of Legal Awareness (SIPLA), a student committee at NLSIU, is organising a guest lecture by Shri Udaya Holla, Senior Advocate and former Advocate General of Karnataka, at the NLS campus on August 9, 2025 at 3.15 PM.

The guest lecture on the topic ‘Litigation Skills & Strategic Advocacy’ will take place in the NLS library basement. The lecture will be followed by a Q&A session. Mr. Siddharth Raja (NLS BA LLB ’97), Professor of Practice at NLSIU and Senior Partner, Vertices Partners, will be the moderator.

About the Speaker

Shri Udaya Holla is a distinguished Senior Advocate and former Advocate General of Karnataka, having served on four occasions, with over five decades of exemplary service in the legal field. He has represented the State of Karnataka in landmark matters, including the interstate boundary dispute with Maharashtra, and has argued in cases of deep cultural and legal significance, such as the legality of the Cauvery Aarti. He currently represents former Karnataka Chief Minister and Union Minister Mr. H.D. Kumaraswamy in the ongoing land encroachment case. Regularly appearing before the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country, Mr. Holla is a leading voice in constitutional and civil litigation.

XIth NLS NMC 2025 | By Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Board

The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Board at NLSIU hosted the 11th edition of the National Law School’s Negotiation, Mediation and Client Counselling Competition (NLS NMC) on August 10, 2025. This year 44 teams participated across segments. The different rounds were distributed between the Training Centre, New Academic Block, and Library on campus.

Winners & Runners Up

Negotiation Rounds

  • Winner: Ritaja Chattopadhyay & Mitul Bhushan (Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai)
  • Runners Up: Diya Jaimon & Arnav Mallaiah (National Law University, Delhi)

Mediation (Client Attorney)

  • Winner: Smriti Sharma & Ayush Tripathi (National Law University Nagpur)
  • Runners Up: Tanaya Kanade & Shivangi Agarwal (Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai (Open Team))

Mediation (Mediator)

  • Winner: Dhanashri Dutta (Maharashtra National University, Mumbai)
  • Runners Up: Manishe Srivastava (Chanakya National Law University, Patna)

Client-Counselling

  • Winner: Yohann Titus Mathew & Khushi Krishania (National Law Institute University, Bhopal)
  • Runners Up: Ahika Singh & Raaghav Kimothi (National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata)

Judges

Mediation

Finals: Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Calcutta High Court; Chitra Narayana, Lawyer, Mediator and Arbitrator; Harish Narasappa, Senior Advocate, High Court of Karnataka

Semi-finals: Shweta Krishnappa, Additional Government Advocate, Advocate General’s Office, Karnataka High Court; Sharan Kukreja, Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Quarter-finals: Biju VS, Independent Law Practice Professional; Bhavna Arul, Legal Associate, Spectrum Legal; Akshay Sreevatsa, Independent Legal Practitioner & Consultant
Anubhab Banerjee, Principal Associate Mediation, CAMP

Negotiation

Finals: Susheela Sarathi, Senior Advocate, High Court of Karnataka

Semi-Finals: Rohit Kumar, Advocate-On-Record (AoR), Supreme Court of India; Aditya Prasad, Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Quarter-finals: Srikanth Parthasarathy, Senior Managing Partner, Chakra Legal; Syed Shujath Mehdi, Principal Associate – Dispute Resolution, Kochhar & Co; Deepthi Rajeev, External General Counsel, Xflow; Rahul Singh, Associate Professor of Law, NLSIU

Client Counselling

Finals: Arjun Perikal, Partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas; Poornima Hatti, Partner, Samvad Partners; Anupama Hebbar, Partner,  Keystone Partners

Semi-Finals: Suraj Sampath, Advocate; Bharati Rao, Founder, Snehi Mediation and Counselling

Problem Drafters

Negotiation

Finals: Harsh Srivastava, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Quarter-finals: Siddhant Pengoriya, Vth-year BA LLB (Hons), NLSIU

Mediation

Finals: Aditya Wakhlu, Founder, Project Law School

Semi-finals: Teja Chhura, Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Quarter-finals: Aman Vasavada, Associate, Verist Law

Client Counselling

Finals: Angad Banerji, Vth-year BA LLB (Hons), NLSIU

Semi-finals: Jwalika, Research Fellow, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

Schedule

Negotiation Segment

Time Particulars
8:45 AM - 9:30 AM  Breakfast and Judges’ Briefing
9:30 AM - 10:15 AM  Quarter Finals 1 and 2
10:25 AM - 11:10 AM  Quarter Finals 3 and 4
11: 20 AM - 11:50 AM  Feedback Session and Result Announcement by Judges
12:00 PM - 12:45 PM  Lunch and Judges’ Briefing
12:45 PM - 1:45 PM  Semi-Finals 1 and 2
1:45 PM - 2:00 PM  Announcement of Finalists
3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Judges’ Briefing over Tea and Snacks
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM Finals Round
6:00 PM - 6:45 PM Closing Ceremony and Result Announcement

Mediation Segment

Time  Particulars
8:45 AM - 9:30 AM  Breakfast and Judges’ Brieng
9:30 AM - 10:15 AM  Quarter Finals 1 and 2
10:25 AM - 11:10 AM  Quarter Finals 3 and 4
11:20 AM - 11:50 AM  Feedback Session & Result Announcement by Judges
12:00 PM - 12:45 PM  Lunch and Judges' Briefing
12:45 PM - 1:45 PM Semi Finals 1
1:55 PM - 2:55 PM Semi Finals 2
3:00 PM -3:15 PM Announcement of Finalists
3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Judges’ Brieng over Tea and Snacks
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM Finals Round
6:00 PM - 6:45 PM Closing Ceremony and Result Announcement

Client-Counselling Segment

Time Particulars
9:15 AM - 9:45 AM  Breakfast and Judges’ Briefing
10:00 AM - 10:40 AM  Semi Finals 1
10:45 AM - 11:25 AM  Semi Finals 2
11:30 AM - 12:10 PM  Semi Finals 3
12:15 PM - 12:55 PM  Semi Finals 4
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM Feedback and Announcement of Finalists
1:30 PM onwards Lunch
3:00 PM- 3:30 PM Judges' Briefing over Tea and Snacks
3:30 PM- 4:25 PM Finals Round 1
4:30 PM- 5:25 PM Finals Round 2
6:00 PM- 6:45 PM Closing Ceremony and Result Announcement

Gallery

Presentation by Dr. Lovleen Bhullar, University of Cambridge | JSW Centre for the Future of Law, NLSIU

The JSW Centre for the Future of Law at NLSIU is launching a series of presentations on contemporary scholarship by leading academics. The first session will be an online presentation by Dr. Lovleen Bhullar, Assistant Professor in Environmental Law, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge. She will present a paper titled ‘Double Trouble: Regulation of Antimicrobial Resistance through New Technologies’ on August 20, 2025 at 4 pm.

The presentation will cover Professor Bullar’s ongoing work on the subject in an upcoming paper. Mr. Ashwin Sapra, Partner (Head – Pharma & Healthcare), Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, will be the discussant.

The Centre’s series of presentations will feature leading scholars on novel scholarship and ongoing work, to enable sharing feedback and perspectives. One of the key thematic areas for the Centre’s work is ‘health, bio‑technology and ethics’, where regulation of medicine, healthcare, access to healthcare and competing concerns will be investigated.

About the Speaker 

Dr. Lovleen Bhullar is an Assistant Professor in Environmental Law in the Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge. She is also a Fellow of Queens’ College. Previously, Dr Bhullar was an Assistant Professor in Birmingham Law School (2020-2024) and a Research Fellow in Regulation and Antimicrobial Resistance at Edinburgh Law School (2018-2020).

Dr. Bhullar is interested in the role of law and policy in addressing antimicrobial resistance, climate change, environmental degradation and water pollution, with a focus on the global majority regions. [Read more]

Abstract of the paper 

Antimicrobial resistance or AMR refers to the development of resistance to antimicrobials among microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites, which makes it difficult to treat infections. Not only does AMR threaten human, animal and plant health, it is also an environmental challenge that contributes to and exacerbates the triple planetary crisis of biodiversity loss, climate change and environmental pollution. A host of existing and “new” technologies have been proposed to address AMR across the human, animal, environmental and plant health sectors.

I adopt the One Health approach to unpack the problem of AMR in India, and examine the role of technologies as part of the regulatory response; and the problems with regulation of technologies themselves. My aim is to highlight the complex and temporal nature of regulation and technologies and their interaction with the socio-economic and political environment, especially in the Global South, and the implications for legal scholarship and practice.

How do I register?  

Attendees are required to register here: Registration link.
The meeting link for the discussion will be shared directly to the registered email address.

For more information or queries, please write to  

NLS Faculty Seminar | ‘The Doctrine of Greater Care: Pharmaceutical Trademarks in India’

In this week’s faculty seminar Aparajita Lath, Assistant Professor of Law, presented her article titled ‘The Doctrine of Greater Care: Pharmaceutical Trademarks in India.’ The seminar was held on August 6, 2025, in the Ground Floor Conference Hall at NLSIU’s Training Centre.

Abstract

The Indian market for pharmaceuticals is filled with ‘sound-alike’ and ‘look-alike’ drugs. There are several examples of different pharmaceutical companies using the same or similar name for different drugs. Not only do such trademarks co-exist in the market but also on the Trade Marks Register (under class 5). This practice has emerged in India due to the growth of a pharmaceutical industry that specialises in generic drugs. On the assumption that generic medicines are substitutes for the innovator’s brand, the Indian pharmaceutical industry has developed a language of its own. It is common in the trade to use brand names that have common suffixes or prefixes that indicate the drug’s purpose, strength or performance. As a result, the same drug and often different drugs may be sold under similar names by different companies.

Regulatorily and clinically, however, Indian generic drugs may not be interchangeable. Given this reality, the language prevalent in the pharmaceutical market has increased confusion with risk of serious consequences to public health and safety. In the absence of regulatory review of drug names in India, courts and the Trade Mark Office have grappled with resolving issues of confusion and harms to public health and safety in pharmaceutical trademark infringement cases and registration proceedings. While the Supreme Court has applied the doctrine of “greater care” to prevent confusion between pharmaceuticals in India, several inconsistencies prevail. This article traces the development of and defines the “doctrine of greater care” in India. It proposes an expansion to the doctrine suitable for the Indian context. It also provides practical and implementable solutions. These changes are in line with the spirit of the Trade Marks Act which focusses not just on protecting commercial interests but also on public health and safety.

Annual Law School Blood Donation Camp | August 13, 2025

The 2nd Edition of the Annual Law School Blood Donation Camp was conducted on August 13, 2025, at the Moot Court Hall in the Old Academic Block. The camp was held in collaboration with Sankalp India Foundation, who had conducted the previous edition of the camp as well. Sankalp works primarily for the cause of children with Thalassemia. Sankalp has 24 Thalassemia Care centres across six states where it administers blood transfusions for free to children suffering from thalassemia.

About the camp

All potential donors were first required to fill out a registration form about their medical history. Following this, a doctor examined their weight, haemoglobin levels, blood pressure, etc. Donors then went into the Moot Court Hall and donated blood, following which they were given biscuits and juice to recuperate. All donors also got certificates to acknowledge their effort.

The camp started at 1:30 PM and ended at 6:30 PM, with a total of 78 units of blood being collected. One unit contained either 350 ml or 450 ml of blood, depending on whether they were first-time donors.

Gallery